Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:19:34.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON TIME VARIATION IN A FORWARD-LOOKING MONETARY POLICY RULE: EVIDENCE FROM EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

N. Kundan Kishor
N. Kundan Kishor*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
*
Address correspondence to: N. Kundan Kishor, Department of Economics, Bolton Hall, Box 0413, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper estimates time-varying forward-looking monetary policy reaction functions for the central banks of France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. We utilize the framework developed by Kim [Economics Letters 91 (2006) 21–26] and Kim and Nelson [Journal of Monetary Economics (2006) 1949–1966] to deal with the issue of endogeneity in a time varying–parameter model. Our results find substantial time variation in the conduct of monetary policy in these four countries, which cannot be adequately captured by the conventional fixed-coefficient approach. Our findings suggest that there was a significant decline in the Bank of France's and the Bank of Italy's response to the German interest rate in 1992, and it coincided with the breakdown of the exchange rate management system in Europe. Our results suggest that the Bank of England was slower than the Bundesbank to increase its response to expected inflation, as its response to inflation became more than one-for-one only in the early 1980s.

Keywords

EndogeneityForward-Looking Monetary PolicyHeteroskedasticityNonlinearityTime-Varying Parameter Model
Type
Notes
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 16 , Supplement S3 , November 2012 , pp. 422 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, D.W.K. and Ploberger, W. (1994) Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica 62 (6), 1383–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assenmacher-Wesche, Katrin (2006) Estimating central banks’ preferences from a time-varying empirical reaction function. European Economic Review 50 (8), 1951–1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batini, N. and Nelson, Edward (2005) The U.K.'s rocky road to stability. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis working paper 2005, 20A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, Jean (2006), Has U.S. monetary policy changed? Evidence from drifting coefficients and real-time data. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 38 (5), 1143–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cecchetti, Stephen G., Hooper, Peter, Kasman, Bruce C., Schoenholtz, Kermit L., and Watson, Mark W. (2007) Understanding the Evolving Inflation Process. U.S. Monetary Policy Forum.Google Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Gali, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark (1998) Monetary policy rules in practice: Some international evidence. European Economic Review, 1003–1067.Google Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Gali, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarida, Richard, Gali, Jordi, and Gertler, Mark (2001) Optimal monetary policy in closed versus open economies: An integrated approach. American Economic Review 91 (2), 248–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogley, Timothy and Sargent, Thomas (2001) Evolving post World War II inflation dynamics. In Bernanke, Ben and Rogoff, Kenneth (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 16, 331–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cukierman, A. (1999) The Inflation Bias Result Revisited. Working paper, Foerder Institute for Economic Research, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Dolado, Juan, Maria-Dolores, Ramon, and Naveira, Manuel (2005) Are monetary policy reaction functions asymmetric. European Economic Review 49 (2), 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, B. and Wyplosz, C. (1993) The unstable EMS. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 51–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Charles and West, Kenneth (2006) Taylor rules and the deutschmark–dollar real exchange rate. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 38 (5), 1175–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B.E. (1992) The likelihood ratio test under non-standard conditions: Testing the Markov switching model of GNP. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7, S61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, J. and Rudebusch, G. (1998) Taylor's rule and the Fed: 1970–1997. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 3, 3–16.Google Scholar
Kim, C.-J. (2006) Time-varying-parameter models with endogenous regressors. Economics Letters 91, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, C.-J. and Nelson, Charles R. (2006) Estimation of a forward-looking monetary policy rule: A time-varying parameter model using ex-post data. Journal of Monetary Economics 1949–1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, C.-J., Kishor, N. Kundan, and Nelson, Charles R. (2007) A Time-Varying Parameter Model for a Forward-Looking Monetary Policy Rule Based on Real-Time Data. University of Washington working paper.Google Scholar
Kishor, N. Kundan and Kochin, Levis A. (2007) The success of the Fed and the death of monetarism. Economic Inquiry 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozicki, Sharon and Tinsley, P.A. (2007) Perhaps the FOMC Did What It Said It Did: An Alternative Interpretation of the Great Inflation. Bank of Canada working paper.Google Scholar
Orphanides, Athanasios (2001) Monetary policy rules based on real-time data. American Economic Review, 964–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orphanides, Athanasios (2002) Monetary policy and the great inflation. American Economic Review, 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partouche, H. (2007) Time-Varying Coefficients in a GMM Framework: Estimation of a Forward Looking Taylor Rule for the Federal Reserve. Banque De France working paper 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruge-Murcia, F.J. (2003) Inflation targeting under asymmetric preferences. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 35 (5), 763–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, Christopher (2001) Discussion of Cogley and Sargent “Evolving Post World War II U.S. inflation dynamics.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 16, 373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, Christopher and Zha, Tao (2002) Macroeconomic Switching. Manuscript, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Stock, James H. and Watson, Mark W. (2002). Has the business cycle changed and why? In Bernanke, Ben and Rogoff, Kenneth (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Vol.17, pp. 159–218. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39, 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyplosz, C. (1999) Towards a More Perfect EMU. CEPR discussion paper series, 2252.Google Scholar