Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:58:28.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DEBT STABILIZATION IN THE PRESENCE OF ENDOGENOUS RISK PREMIA: A DYNAMIC GAME APPROACH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2018

Tzanis Anevlavis ,
George Papavassilopoulos ,
Jacob Engwerda  and
Bas van Aarle
Tzanis Anevlavis
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Athens
George Papavassilopoulos
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Athens
Jacob Engwerda*
Affiliation:
Tilburg University
Bas van Aarle
Affiliation:
Leuven Centre for Irish Studies
*
Address correspondence to: Jacob Engwerda, Department of Econometrics and O.R., Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the possibility that financial markets require risk premia on holding sovereign debt of countries that appear vulnerable from a fiscal sustainability perspective. Both the level of debt as well as the rate of change of debt are assumed to impact on the risk premium. We analyze the impact of such an endogenous risk premium in a simple debt game between a monetary and a fiscal player, as introduced by [Tabellini (1986) Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 10, 427–442]. The risk premium term adds a nonlinearity to the linear model in case risk premia are absent. We analyze outcomes in case of noncooperative open-loop Nash strategies and in case of cooperative strategies and consider the workings of the risk premium as a market-based disciplining device (in case of high debt) and adjustment rewarding device (in case of a declining debt trajectory).

Keywords

Debt StabilizationDifferential GamesNonlinear Dynamical SystemsRisk PremiumEconomic Dynamics
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 23 , Issue 7 , October 2019 , pp. 2616 - 2648
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank two anonymous referees, Guido Tabellini and seminar participants of the 17th ISDG conference for useful comments on a first version of the paper.

References

REFERENCES

Alessandrini, P., Fratianni, M., Hallett, A. Hughes, and Presbitero, A. (2014) External imbalances and fiscal fragility in the Euro Area. Open Economies Review 25, 3–34.10.1007/s11079-013-9305-5Google Scholar
Baldacci, E. and Kumar, M. (2012) Fiscal Deficits, Public Debt, and Sovereign Bond Yields. IMF working paper 10/184.Google Scholar
Başar, T. and Olsder, G. J. (1999) Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory. Philadelphia: SIAM.Google Scholar
Bayoumi, T., Goldstein, M., and Woglom, G. (1995) Do credit markets discipline sovereign borrowers? Evidence from U.S. states. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27 (4), 1046–1059.10.2307/2077788Google Scholar
Bernoth, K., von Hagen, J., and Schuknecht, L. (2013) Sovereign risk premiums in the European govesrnment bond market. Journal of International Money and Finance 31, 975–995.10.1016/j.jimonfin.2011.12.006Google Scholar
Bikchandani, S. and Sharma, S. (2001) Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Staff Papers 47 (3), 279–310.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O., Chouraqui, J., Hangemann, R., and Sartor, N. (1990) The sustainability of fiscal policy: New answers to an old question. OECD Economic Studies 15 (1), 7–36.Google Scholar
Blueschke, D. and Neck, R. (2011) “Core” and “Periphery” in a monetary union: A macroeconomic policy game. International Advances in Economic Research 17, 334–346.10.1007/s11294-011-9303-6Google Scholar
Castren, O. (1998) Optimal fiscal and monetary policy under debt reduction programmes. Fiscal-Monetary Policy Coordination and Central Bank Independence. Ph.D. thesis, Bank of Finland Studies E:13, 1998 (Chapter 4).Google Scholar
Cooper, L. (2013) Herding behaviour in financial markets. http://coopercity.co.uk/herding-behaviour-in-financial-markets/Google Scholar
Day, R. (2000) Complex Economic Dynamics, vol. 2. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P. and Ji, Y. (2012) Mispricing of Sovereign Risk and Multiple Equilibria in the Eurozone. CEPS working paper 361.10.2139/ssrn.1996484Google Scholar
Di Bartolomeo, G. and Di Gioacchino, D. (2008) Fiscal-monetary policy coordination and debt management: A two-stage analysis. Empirica 35, 433–448.10.1007/s10663-008-9077-0Google Scholar
Domar, E. (1944) The “Burden of the Debt” and the national income. American Economic Review 34 (4), 798–827.Google Scholar
Engwerda, J. C. (2005) LQ Dynamic Optimization and Differential Games. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Engwerda, J. C. (2010) Necessary and sufficient conditions for Pareto optimal solutions of cooperative differential games. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 48, 3859–3881.10.1137/080726227Google Scholar
Engwerda, J., van Aarle, B., Plasmans, J., and Weeren, A. (2013) Debt stabilization games in the presence of risk premia. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37, 2525–2546.10.1016/j.jedc.2013.06.008Google Scholar
Engwerda, J. C., Mahmoudinia, D., and Isfahani, R. D. (2016) Government and central bank interaction under uncertainty: A differential games approach. Iranian Economic Review 20, 225–259.Google Scholar
Engwerda, J., van Aarle, B., Weeren, A., and Plasmans, J. (2015) Debt stabilization games in a monetary union with endogenous risk premia. In Wohlgemuth, N. and Bluschke, D. (eds.), Festschrift für Reinhard Neck zum 65. Geburtstag, pp. 149–180. Peter Lang: Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Figuieres, C. (2008) European Central Bank, international strategic relations and the stabilisation of debt. Recherches Economiques de Louvain 74 (2), 167–190.10.3917/rel.742.0167Google Scholar
Foresti, P. (2017) Monetary and fiscal policies interaction in monetary unions. Journal of Economic Surveys. doi: 10.1111/joes.12194Google Scholar
Ghosh, A., Kim, J., Mendoza, E., Ostry, J., and Qureshi, M. (2013) Fiscal fatigue, fiscal space and debt sustainability in advanced economies. The Economic Journal 123, F4–F30.10.1111/ecoj.12010Google Scholar
von Hagen, J., Schuknecht, L., and Wolswijk, G. (2011) Government bond risk premiums in the EU revisited: The impact of the financial crisis. European Journal of Political Economy 27, 36–43.10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.07.002Google Scholar
Haugh, D., Ollivaud, P., and Turner, D. (2009) What Drives Sovereign Risk Premiums?: An Analysis of Recent Evidence from the Euro Area. OECD Economics Department working papers no. 718.Google Scholar
Heinemann, F., Osterloh, S., and Kalb, A. (2014) Sovereign risk premia: The link between fiscal rules and stability culture. Journal of International Money and Finance 41, 110–127.10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.11.002Google Scholar
Hughes Hallett, A. (1986) Autonomy and the choice of policy in asymmetrically dependent economies. An investigation of the gains from international policy co-ordination. Oxford Economic Papers 38, 516–544.10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041755Google Scholar
Hughes Hallett, A. and Weymark, D. (2007) Fiscal leadership and central bank design. Journal of Canadian Economics 40 (2), 607–627.10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00423.xGoogle Scholar
Hughes Hallett, A. J. (2008) Debt targets and fiscal sustainability in an era of monetary independence. International Economics and Economic Policy 5 (1), 165–187.10.1007/s10368-008-0109-9Google Scholar
Irving, R. S. (2004) Integers, Polynomials, and Rings. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Leeper, E. M. (1991) Equilibria under “active” and “passive” monetary and fiscal policies. Journal of Monetary Economics 27, 129–147.10.1016/0304-3932(91)90007-BGoogle Scholar
Lukkezen, J. and Rojas-Romagosa, H. (2012) When is Debt Sustainable? CPB discussion paper 212, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
Neck, R. and Sturm, J. E. (2008) Sustainability of Public Debt. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262140980.001.0001Google Scholar
Reddy, P. V. and Engwerda, J. C. (2014) Necessary and sufficient conditions for Pareto Optimality in infinite horizon cooperative differential games. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 59, 2536–2543.10.1109/TAC.2014.2305933Google Scholar
Reinhart, C. M. and Rogoff, K. (2010) Growth in times of debt. American Economic Review 100, 573–578.10.1257/aer.100.2.573Google Scholar
Sargent, T. J. and Wallace, N. (1981) Some unpleasant monetarist arithmetic. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, Fall, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Staehler, N. (2013) Recent developments in quantitative models of sovereign default. Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (4), 605–633.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00741.xGoogle Scholar
Tabellini, G. (1986) Money, debt and deficits in a dynamic game. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 10, 427–442.10.1016/S0165-1889(86)80001-XGoogle Scholar
Unctad, 2009. Compendium on Debt Sustainability and Development. United Nations, New York and Geneva, pp. 1–218.Google Scholar
van Aarle, B., Bovenberg, L., and Raith, M. (1997) Is there a tragedy of a common Central Bank? A dynamic analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21 (2–3), 417–447.10.1016/S0165-1889(96)00939-6Google Scholar
van den Broek, B. (2002) Moving horizon control in dynamic games. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26 (6), 937–961.10.1016/S0165-1889(01)00004-5Google Scholar