Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:12:53.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CURRENT ACCOUNT DYNAMICS AND THE REAL EXCHANGE RATE: DISENTANGLING THE EVIDENCE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2018

Matthieu Bussière ,
Aikaterini E. Karadimitropoulou  and
Miguel A. León-Ledesma
Matthieu Bussière
Affiliation:
Banque de France
Aikaterini E. Karadimitropoulou*
Affiliation:
Bank of Greece and University of East Anglia
Miguel A. León-Ledesma
Affiliation:
University of Kent
*
Address correspondence to: Aikaterini Karadimitropoulou, Department of Economic Analysis and Research, Bank of Greece, 21, E. Venizelos Ave., 102 50, Athens, Greece; e-mail: [email protected]. Phone: +30 210 320 2346. Fax: +30 210 323 3025.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the main shocks driving current account (CA) fluctuations for the G6 economies, using a standard two-good intertemporal model. We build a structural vector autoregression model including the world real interest rate, net output (NO), the real exchange rate, and the CA and identify four structural shocks. Our results suggest four main conclusions: (i) there is substantial support for the two-good intertemporal model with time-varying interest rate, since both external supply and preference shocks account for an important proportion of CA fluctuations; (ii) temporary domestic shocks account for a large proportion of CA fluctuations, albeit smaller than in previous studies; (iii) our results alleviate the puzzle in the literature that a shock that explains little about NO changes can explain a large proportion of CA changes; (iv) the nature of the shock matters to shape the relationship between the CA and the real exchange rate.

Keywords

Current AccountReal Exchange RateTwo-Good Intertemporal ModelSVAR
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 28 - 58
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank participants at the 3rd HenU/INFER Workshop on Applied Macroeconomics for their comments. We would also like to thank Harald Uhlig, Shaun Hargreaves-Heap, and an anonymous referee for their useful suggestions. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Banque de France, Bank of Greece, or the Eurosystem.

References

Ahmed, S. and Park, J. H. (1994) Sources of macroeconomic fluctuations in small open economies. Journal of Macroeconomics 16(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1990) World real interest rates. In: Blanchard, O. J., and Fischer, S. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990, Vol. 5, pp. 15–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barthélemy, J. and Cléaud, G. (2018) Trade balance and inflation fluctuations in the euro area. Macroeconomic Dynamics 22(4), 931–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergin, P. R. and Sheffrin, S. M. (2000) Interest rates, exchange rates and present value models of the current account. The Economic Journal 110(463), 535–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, C. M. and Kehoe, T. J. (2008) Real Exchange Rate Movements and the Relative Price of Non-Traded Goods. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., NBER Working Paper No. 14437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. J. and Quah, D. (1989) The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review 79(4), 655–673.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. J. and Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2011) (Why) Should Current Account Balances Be Reduced? IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/11/03. Washington: International Monetary Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouakez, H. and Kano, T. (2008) Terms of trade and current account fluctuations: The Harberger-Laursen-Metzler effect revisited. Journal of Macroeconomics 30(1), 260–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracke, T., Bussière, M., Fidora, M. and Straub, R. (2010) A framework for assessing global imbalances. The World Economy 33(9), 1140–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brissimis, S., Hondroyiannis, G., Papazoglou, C., Tsaveas, N. T. and Vasardani, M. A. (2012) Current account determinants and external sustainability in periods of structural change. Economic Change and Restructuring 45(1), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R. J., Farhi, E. and Gourinchas, P.-O. (2008) An equilibrium model of “global imbalances” and low interest rates. American Economic Review 98(1), 358–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R. J., Farhi, E. and Gourinchas, P.-O. (2015) Global Imbalances and Currency Wars at the ZLB. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., NBER Working Papers 21670.Google Scholar
Caballero, R. J., Farhi, E. and Gourinchas, P.-O. (2016) Safe asset scarcity and aggregate demand. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 106(5), 513–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R. J. and Krishnamurthy, A. (2009) Global imbalances and financial fragility. American Economic Review 99(2), 584–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. Y. (1987) Does saving anticipate declining labor income? An alternative test of the permanent income hypothesis. Econometrica 55(6), 1249–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. Y. and Shiller, R. J. (1987) Cointegration and tests of present value models. Journal of Political Economy 95(5), 1062–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ca’Zorzi, M. and Rubaszek, M. (2012) On the empirical evidence of the intertemporal current account model for the euro area countries. Review of Development Economics 16(1), 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerrato, M., Kalyoncu, H., Naqvi, H. N. and Tsoukis, C. (2014) Current accounts in the long run and the intertemporal approach: A panel data investigation. World Economy 38(2), 340–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopoulos, D. K. and León-Ledesma, M. A. (2010) What did we really know about current account sustainability in the USA? Journal of International Money and Finance 29(3), 442–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornbusch, R. (1983) Real interest rates, home goods and optimal external borrowing. Journal of Political Economy 91(1), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, B. J. (2006) The blind men and the elephant. Issues in Economic Policy Brookings Institution 1, 1–25.Google Scholar
Engel, C. (1999) Accounting for U.S. real exchange rate changes. Journal of Political Economy 107, 507–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, A. L. and León-Ledesma, M. A. (2007) Does the real interest parity hypothesis hold? Evidence for developed and emerging markets. Journal of International Money and Finance 26(3), 364–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, A. R. (1995) International capital mobility among the major industrialised countries: Too little or too much? The Economic Journal 105(428), 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnimassoun, B. and Mignon, V. (2016) How do macroeconomic imbalances interact? Evidence from a panel VAR analysis. Macroeconomic Dynamics 20(7), 1717–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. and Lin, K. S. (1993) Deficits, government expenditures, and tax smoothing in the United States: 1929-1988. Journal of Monetary Economics 31, 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2004) World Economic Outlook. Washington DC: IMF.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2017) External Sector Report. Washington DC: IMF. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2017/07/27/2017-external-sector-report.Google Scholar
Kano, T. (2008) A structural VAR approach to the intertemporal model of the current account. Journal of International Money and Finance 27(5), 757–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, P. R. (2001) Money shocks and the current account. In: Calvo, G., Dornbush, R., and Obstfeld, M. (eds.), Money, Factor Mobility and Trade: Essays on Honor of Robert Mundell. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J. and Chinn, M. D. (2006) Current account and real exchange dynamics in the G7 countries. Journal of International Money and Finance 25(2), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nason, J. M. and Rogers, J. H. (2006) The present-value model of the current account has been rejected: Round up the usual suspects. Journal of International Economics 68(1), 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neely, C. J. and Rapach, D. (2008) Real Interest Rate Persistence: Evidence and Implications. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Working Paper Series 2008–018A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, S. and Perron, P. (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69(6), 1519–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obstfeld, M. and Rogoff, K. (1995) The intertemporal approach to the current account. In: Grossman, G. M., and Rogoff, K. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 731–1799. New York: North Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, M. and Rogoff, K. (1996) Foundations of International Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Otto, G. (1992) Testing a present value model of the current account: Evidence from U.S. and Canadian time series. Journal of International Money and Finance 11(5), 414–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, L. A., Jaewoo, L. and Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2013) Real exchange rates and fundamentals: A cross-country perspective. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 45(5), 845–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Servén, L. and Nguyen, H. (2010) Global Imbalances before and after the Global Crisis. The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series 5354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheffrin, S. and Woo, W. T. (1990a) Testing an optimizing model of the current account via the consumption function. Journal of International Money and Finance 9(2), 220–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheffrin, S. and Woo, W. T. (1990b) Present value tests of an intertemporal model of the current account. Journal of International Economics 29(3-4), 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. M. (2002) A century of current account dynamics. Journal of International Money and Finance 21(6), 725–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar