Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:16:31.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Religious Tolerance and Intolerance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Concept of Tolerance. There is about tolerance something paradoxical, for it consists, in fact, in permitting something which we know with certainty to be either an evil or an error: permissio negativa mali, as the theologian carefully defines it. Negative, because the permission does not imply either encouragement or approval.

From this definition it follows that tolerance is not, in the strict sense of the word, a virtue. We ought rather to say that the exercise of tolerance is authorized and required by a virtue, on account of some greater good which must be promoted or defended. The ultimate justification for tolerance has to be sought in the reflection of the divine laws governing the world, which human rulers are required to achieve. ‘Human government', says St Thomas, ‘is derived from the divine government, and must imitate it.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Footnotes

1

A French version of this conference by the Cardinal Archbishop of Bologna appeared in La Documentation Catholique, March 1959, and this translation of it by G. F. Pullen is here printed by kind permission of the editor.

References

2 Pius XII. Allocution to Italian Catholic Jurists, 6th December 1953.

3 R. Aubert, L'Enseignement sur le Libéralisme, in Tolérance et communauté humane, Casterman, 1951 (a symposium).