Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:44:54.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Liturgy and Literary Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper I want first of all to examine what the liturgy essentially (or rather existentially) is: and then, having made my view of that question clear I want to make some brief suggestions as to how this conception of the liturgy might be grasped by undergraduates taking a combined honours course in theology and English literature. I am going to discuss this particular combination of subjects, partly because it is explicitly mentioned by Laurence Bright in his paper in the symposium, but also because I think it is a combination particularly interesting in itself. What I have to say must not be construed as constituting a syllabus for a course let alone as a substitute for the teaching of the history of liturgical forms and their relation to the theological preoccupations of their periods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Footnotes

1

This was the fourth paper read at the Leicester Conference which was described in our last issue.

References

2 cf. Southern, R. W. The Church of the Dark Ages in The Layman in Christian History (S.C.M. 1963), p. 89Google Scholar.

3 Cf. my Culture and Liturgy, pp. 84-85

4 cf. Roger Sharrock: John Bunyan, London 1954. I am indebted to this book for much of this section.