Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:19:31.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Death to Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Students of primitive religions have revealed some very important aspects of the natural response of man to the Creator, aspects which have sometimes become overlaid by the more sophisticated types of cultured religion. One of the differences between that natural response and the educated worship of classical times may be seen in the theory and practice of purification, and the comparison between the two bears remarkably on the modern Christian's attitude to mortification.

The almost universal conception of purity and impurity is that of the unmixed and the mixed. The pure note sounds without admixture of over- or under-tones, or of any other sound but its simple music; pure milk has no foreign germ, no water mixed with it. And among the primitive peoples the brand of impurity or defilement arose from the mixture of races, of sexes, of seasons. Men have to keep their weapons and implements apart from the Women's household utensils.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1951 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

1 It is noteworthy in this connection that the words for the stain and for the sacrifice that removed it were the same; that men were defiled by touching the holy consecrated thing like the Ark; that the same word is often used for ‘the gods’ and ‘the defiled’; that the word ‘expiate’ means literally to rid oneself of the ‘sacred’ element contracted” by some fault.

2 Histoire Générale des Religions (Librairie Aristide Quillet) i, 21 sqq.