Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:46:12.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Analyst and the Confessor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We are often assured by those who should know best that sacramental confession and psychological analysis are very much the same thing. On this point at least there would seem to be a considerable measure of agreement between many Catholic spokesmen and many psychologists: if they differ it is only in the assertion of the superiority of their own respective wares. While the psychologists will tell us that sacramental confession is a sort of naïve and undeveloped, pre-scientitic forerunner of a psychological analysis, it has become almost a commonplace among many Catholic apologists that analysis is a secularised anil truncated form of sacramental confession.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1949 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Footnotes

1

Reprinted from THE COMMONWEAL (New York), 23 July 1948, by kind permission of the Editors.

References

2 I use this somewhat dumsy term rather than ‘psycho-analysis’ lest I be thought to have in mind only Freudian analysis, of which alone the term ‘psycho-analysis’ can strictly be used. By ‘psychological analysis’ I understand any psychotherapy which employs depth-analysis, whether Freudian, Jimgian, or any other.