Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:42:23.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two new species of Roccellaceae (Ascomycota: Arthoniales) from Brazil, with the description of the new genus Sergipea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2013

André APTROOT
Affiliation:
ABL Herbarium, G.v.d.Veenstraat 107, NL-3762 XK Soest, The Netherlands. Email [email protected]
Damien ERTZ
Affiliation:
National Botanic Garden of Belgium, Domein van Bouchout, 1860 Meise, Belgium
Edvaneide Leandro de LIMA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Micologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, CEP: 50670-901, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Katia Almeida de JESUS
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, CEP: 49500-000, Itabaiana, Sergipe, Brazil
Leonor Costa MAIA
Affiliation:
Departamento de Micologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, CEP: 50670-901, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Marcela Eugenia da Silva CÁCERES
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, CEP: 49500-000, Itabaiana, Sergipe, Brazil

Abstract

The new lichen genus Sergipea M. Cáceres, Ertz & Aptroot is described in the Roccellaceae, based on the new species Sergipea aurata M. Cáceres, Ertz & Aptroot from NE Brazil. The species was found in a remnant of Atlantic transition forest in Sergipe. It is similar in many respects to species of the genus Enterographa, but it is characterized by bright orange stromata, due to the presence of an anthraquinone, and a thallus with a somewhat byssoid hypothallus. Phylogenetically it is close to the genera Dichosporidium and Erythrodecton. The phylogenetic position of the generic type of Dichosporidium confirms the close relationship of the genus to Erythrodecton in the basal branch of the Roccellaceae. A new species of Enterographa is also described from NE Brazil. Enterographa rotundata E. L. Lima, M. Cáceres & Aptroot has solitary, round apothecia, which is unusual in this genus with mainly elongated apothecia or punctiform apothecia arranged in lines. It was found in Caatinga forest in Pernambuco.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cáceres, M. E. S. (2007) Corticolous crustose and microfoliose lichens of northeastern Brazil. Libri Botanici 22: 1168.Google Scholar
Cáceres, M. E. S., Lücking, R. & Rambold, G. (2007) Phorophyte specificity and environmental parameters versus stochasticity as determinants for species composition of corticolous lichen communities in the Atlantic rain forest of northeastern Brazil. Mycological Progress 6: 117136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cáceres, M. E. S., Lücking, R. & Rambold, G. (2008) Corticolous microlichens in northeastern Brazil: habitat differentiation between coastal Mata Atlântica, Caatinga and Brejos de Altitude. Bryologist 111: 98117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertz, D. (2009 a) A new species of Enterographa, E. diederichiana (Roccellaceae), from Zambia. Bryologist 112: 390393.Google Scholar
Ertz, D. (2009 b) Revision of the corticolous Opegrapha species from the paleotropics. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 102: 1176.Google Scholar
Ertz, D. & Tehler, A. (2011) The phylogeny of Arthoniales (Pezizomycotina) inferred from nucLSU and RPB2 sequences. Fungal Diversity 49: 4769.Google Scholar
Ertz, D., Christnach, C., Wedin, M. & Diederich, P. (2005) A world monograph of the genus Plectocarpon (Roccellaceae, Arthoniales). Bibliotheca Lichenologica 91: 1155.Google Scholar
Ertz, D., Miądlikowska, J., Lutzoni, F., Dessein, S., Raspe, O., Vigneron, N., Hofstetter, V. & Diederich, P. (2009) Towards a new classification of the Arthoniales (Ascomycota) based on a three-gene phylogeny focussing on the genus Opegrapha . Mycological Research 113: 141152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera-Campos, M. A. & Lücking, R. (2002) The foliicolous lichen flora of Mexico. I. New species from Los Tuxtlas Tropical Biology Station, Veracruz. Lichenologist 34: 211222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagadeesh Ram, T. A. M., Sinha, G. P. & Singh, K. P. (2008) New species and new records of Enterographa (Roccellaceae) from India. Lichenologist 40: 415418.Google Scholar
Lima, E. L., Mendoça, C. O., Maia, L. C., Aptroot, A. & Cáceres, M. E. S. (2013) Two new species of Pyrenula with red or orange thallus from Vale do Catimbau National Park, Pernambuco, Brazil. Lichenologist 45: 199202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lücking, R. (1991) Neue Arten foliikoler Flechten aus Costa Rica, Zentralamerika. Nova Hedwigia 52: 267304.Google Scholar
Lücking, R. (2008) Foliicolous lichenized fungi. Flora Neotropica 103: 1866.Google Scholar
Lücking, R., Sérusiaux, E., Maia, L. C. & Pereira, C. G. (1998) A revision of the names of foliicolous lichenized fungi published by Batista and co-workers between 1960 and 1975. Lichenologist 30: 121191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, D. & Maddison, W. (2002) MacClade Version 4.03PPC: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
de Menezes, A. A., Xavier-Leite, A. B., Otsuka, A. Y. de Jesus, L. S. & Cáceres, M. E. S. (2011) New records of crustose and microfoliose corticicolous lichens in Caatinga vegetation of the semi-arid region in Alagoas. Acta Botanica Brasilica 25: 885889.Google Scholar
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 November 2010, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelsen, M. P., Lücking, R., Grube, M., Mbatchou, J. S., Muggia, L., Rivas Plata, E. & Lumbsch, H. T. (2009) Unravelling the phylogenetic relationships of lichenised fungi in Dothideomyceta. Studies in Mycology 64: 135144.Google Scholar
Orange, A., James, P. W. & White, F. J. (2001) Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817818.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. J. (2007) Tracer v1.5. Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 15721574.Google Scholar
Seaward, M. R. D. & Aptroot, A. (2009) Checklist of lichens for the Seychelles group. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 99: 335366.Google Scholar
Sipman, H. J. M. (2011) New and notable species of Enterographa, Niebla and Sclerophyton s. lat. from coastal Chile. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 106: 297308.Google Scholar
Sparrius, L. B. (2004) A monograph of Enterographa and Sclerophyton . Bibliotheca Lichenologica 89: 1141.Google Scholar
Sparrius, L. B. & Aptroot, A. (2007) A new lichenicolous Enterographa species from Britanny (France). Lichenologist 39: 315317.Google Scholar
Sparrius, L. B. & Björk, C. R. (2008) Enterographa oregonensis (Roccellaceae), a new foliicolous species from the northwest coast of North America. Bryologist 111: 487489.Google Scholar
Sparrius, L. B., Saipunkaew, W., Wolseley, P. A. & Aptroot, A. (2006) New species of Bactrospora, Enterographa, Graphidastra and Lecanographa from northern Thailand and Vietnam. Lichenologist 38: 2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D. L. (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Yeshitela, K., Fischer, E., Killmann, D. & Sérusiaux, E. (2009) Two new foliicolous species of Enterographa (Roccellaceae) from Kenya. Lichenologist 41: 1723.Google Scholar
Zoller, S., Scheidegger, C. & Sperisen, C. (1999) PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming ascomycetes. Lichenologist 31: 511516.Google Scholar