Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:14:15.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New species and new combinations in the lichen genera Fissurina and Hemithecium from India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2012

Bharati O. SHARMA ,
Pradnya KHADILKAR  and
Urmila MAKHIJA
Bharati O. SHARMA
Affiliation:
Agharkar Research Institute, G.G. Agarkar Road, Pune—411004, India. Email: [email protected]
Pradnya KHADILKAR
Affiliation:
Agharkar Research Institute, G.G. Agarkar Road, Pune—411004, India. Email: [email protected]
Urmila MAKHIJA
Affiliation:
Agharkar Research Institute, G.G. Agarkar Road, Pune—411004, India. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In continuation of our ongoing revisionary studies on the lichen family Graphidaceae from India, a treatment of 25 species of the lichen genera Fissurina and Hemithecium from India is presented. In our earlier work on the lichen genus Fissurina, 16 species were reported from India. In the present study, 17 additional species of Fissurina from India are recognized. Nine species, viz. Fissurina andamanensis, F. disposita, F. immersa, F. indica, F. microcarpa, F. nicobarensis, F. simplex, F. sporolata, and F. submonospora, are described as new to science. Seven species, viz. Fissurina canlaonensis, F. cingalina, F. comparimuralis, F. monospora, F. nitidescens, F. rubiginosa, and F. subnitidula, are recorded for the first time from India. One species, Fissurina sp. 1, is recorded but not formally described as new due to scanty material. Eight species in the lichen genus Hemithecium, including three new species, viz. H. kodayarense, H. longilirellatum, H. verrucosum, and five new combinations, viz. Hemithecium andamanicum, H. flabillatum, H. flavoalbum, H. flexile, and H. norlabiatum, are also recognized in the present work. A revised key for the identification of all 33 species of Fissurina and 26 species of Hemithecium so far known from India is provided.

Keywords

Graphidaceaelichenized ascomycetestaxonomy
Type
Research Article
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , May 2012 , pp. 339 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adawadkar, B. & Makhija, U. (2005) Some trans-septate species of the genera Hemithecium and Platythecium from India. Mycotaxon 92: 387–394.Google Scholar
Aptroot, A., Karnefelt, I. & Tibell, L. (1994) Caliciales, Graphidales and Teloschistales. In Ascomycete Systematics: Problems and Perspectives in the Nineties (Hawksworth, D. L., ed.): 393–396. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, A. W. (2006) The lichen family Graphidaceae in Australia. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 94: 1–191.Google Scholar
Archer, A. W. (2007) Key and checklist for the lichen family Graphidaceae (lichenised Ascomycota) in the Solomon Islands. Systematics and Biodiversity 5: 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, A. W. (2009) Graphidaceae. In Flora of Australia. Vol. 57. Lichens 5 (McCarthy, P. M., ed.): Melbourne: ABRS/ CSIRO.Google Scholar
Chitale, G., Makhija, U. & Sharma, B. O. (2009) New combinations and new species in the lichen genera Hemithecium and Pallidogramme. Mycotaxon 108: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culberson, C. F. (1972) Improved conditions and new data for the identification of lichen products by a standardized thin-layer chromatographic method. Journal of Chromatography 72: 113–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culberson, C. F. & Kristinsson, H. (1970) A standardized method for the identification of lichen products. Journal of Chromatography 46: 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, O. E. & Hawksworth, D. L. (1998) Outline of the ascomycetes-1998. Systema Ascomycetum 16: 83–296.Google Scholar
Fée, A. L. (1824) Méthode Lichénographique et Genera. Paris: Firmin Didot.Google Scholar
Jagadeesh Ram, T. A. M. & Sinha, G. P. (2009) New species of Graphis and Hemithecium (lichenized Ascomycota) from Eastern Himalaya, India. Mycotaxon 110: 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalb, K. & Hafellner, J. (1992) Bemerkenswerte Flechten und lichenicole Plize von der Insel Madeira. Herzogia 9: 45–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lendemer, J. C. (2007) Lichens of Eastern North America Exsiccati, Fascicle V, nos. 201–250. Opuscula Philolichenum 4: 69–80.Google Scholar
Lücking, R., Chaves, J. L., Sipman, H. J. M., Umaña, L. & Aptroot, A. (2008) A first assessment of the Ticolichen biodiversity inventory in Costa Rica: the genus Graphis, with notes on the genus Hemithecium (Ascomycota: Ostropales: Graphidaceae) Fieldiana Botany 46(1): 1–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lücking, R., Seavey, F., Common, R. S., Beeching, S. Q., Breuss, O., Buck, W. R., Crane, L., Hodges, M., Hodkinson, B. P., Lay, E. et al. (2011). The lichens of Fakahatchee strand preserve State Park, Florida: Proceedings from the 18th Tuckerman Workshop. Florida Museum of Natural History 49(4): 127–186.Google Scholar
Lumbsch, H. T., Ahti, T., Altermann, S., Amo de Paz, G., Aptroot, A., Arup, U., Bárcenas Peña, A., Bawingan, P. A., Benatti, M. N., Betancourt, L. et al. (2011) One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: a signature of undiscovered global diversity. Phytotaxa 18: 1–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makhija, U. & Adawadkar, B. (2005) Some additions to the Graphidaceae in the Andaman Islands, India. Mycotaxon 91: 347–352.Google Scholar
Makhija, U. & Adawadkar, B. (2007) Trans-septate species of Acanthothecis and Fissurina from India. Lichenologist 39: 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makhija, U., Dube, A., Adawadkar, B. & Chitale, G. (2005) Five trans-septate species of Hemithecium from India. Mycotaxon 93: 365–372.Google Scholar
Mangold, A., Martín, M. P., Lücking, R. & Lumbsch, T. H. (2008) Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Thelotremataceae within Graphidaceae (Ascomycota: Ostropales). Taxon 57: 476–486.Google Scholar
Müller Argoviensis, J. (1880) Lichenologische Beiträge X. Flora 63: 40–45.Google Scholar
Müller Argoviensis, J. (1882) Lichenologische Beiträge XV. Flora 65: 381–386.Google Scholar
Nakanishi, M., Kashiwadani, H. & Moon, K. H. (2003) Taxonomical notes on Japanese Graphidaceae (Ascomycotina), including some new combinations. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo, Series B 29(2): 83–93.Google Scholar
Patwardhan, P. G. & Kulkarni, C. R. (1976) Some additions to the lichen flora of India IV: Graphis and Graphina (family Graphidaceae). Biovigyanam 2: 123–132.Google Scholar
Redinger, K. (1935) Die Graphidineen der ersten Regnell'schen Expedition nach Brasilien 1892–1894. III. Graphis, Phaeographis, nebst einem Nachtrage zu Graphina. Arkiv för Botanik 27 A(3): 1–103.Google Scholar
Staiger, B. (2002) Die Flechtenfamilie Graphidaceae: Studien in Richtung einer natürlicheren Gliederung. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 85: 1–526.Google Scholar
Staiger, B. & Kalb, K. (1999) Acanthothecis and other graphidioid lichens with warty periphysoids or paraphysis-tips. Mycotaxon 73: 69–134.Google Scholar
Staiger, B. & Kalb, K. (2004) Fissurina. In Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region, vol. 2 (Nash, T. H. III, Ryan, B. D., Diederich, P. Gries, C. & Bungartz, F., eds): 109–110. Tempe, Arizona: Lichens Unlimited, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
Staiger, B., Kalb, K. & Grube, M. (2006) Phylogeny and phenotypic variation in the lichen family Graphidaceae (Ostropomycetidea, Ascomycota). Mycological Research 110: 765–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vainio, E. A. (1921) Lichenes insularum Philippinarum, III. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae 15 (6): 1–368.Google Scholar
White, F. J. & James, P. W. (1985) A new guide to microchemical techniques for the identification of lichen substances. British Lichen Society Bulletin 57:1–41.Google Scholar
Zahlbruckner, A. (1923) Catalogus Lichenum Universalis 2(2–3): 145–452.Google Scholar