Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:19:00.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micarea capitata, a new bryophilous lichen from Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2011

Måns SVENSSON  and
Göran THOR
Måns SVENSSON
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7044, SE 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The diminutive species Micarea capitata is described from north-western Sweden. It has been found at two localities in boreal forests where it grew on the bryophyte Hylocomium splendens. Micarea capitata is distinguished by small (0·10–0·35 mm diam.) black apothecia, (0–)1-septate ascospores and a mottled, darkly pigmented hypothecium.

Keywords

apothecial pigmentsEuropeFennoscandiamuscicolousPilocarpaceae
Type
Research Article
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 43 , Issue 5 , September 2011 , pp. 401 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, H. L. & Ekman, S. (2004) Phylogeny of the Micareaceae inferred from nrSSU DNA sequences. Lichenologist 36: 27–35.Google Scholar
Andersen, H. L. & Ekman, S. (2005) Disintegration of the Micareaceae (lichenized Ascomycota): a molecular phylogeny based on mitochondrial rDNA sequences. Mycological Research 109: 21–30.Google Scholar
Arup, U., Ekman, S., Lindblom, L. & Mattsson, J.-E. (1993) High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC), an improved technique for screening lichen substances. Lichenologist 25:61–71.Google Scholar
Coppins, B. J. (1983) A taxonomic study of the lichen genus Micarea in Europe. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Botany Series 11: 17–214.Google Scholar
Coppins, B. J. (2009) Micarea Fr. (1825). In The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland (Smith, C. W., Aptroot, A., Coppins, B. J., Fletcher, A., Gilbert, O. L., James, P. W. & Wolseley, P. A., eds): 371–384. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Czarnota, P. (2007) The lichen genus Micarea (Lecanorales, Ascomycota) in Poland. Polish Botanical Studies 23: 1–199.Google Scholar
Czarnota, P. & Guzow-Krzemińska, B. (2010) A phylogenetic study of the Micarea prasina group shows that Micarea micrococca includes three distinct lineages. Lichenologist 42: 7–21.Google Scholar
Döbbeler, P. (1997) Biodiversity of bryophilous ascomycetes. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 721–738.Google Scholar
Eriksson, O. E., Baral, H.-O., Currah, R. S., Hansen, K., Kurtzman, C. P., Rambold, G. & Laessøe, T. (2004) Outline of Ascomycota – 2004. Myconet 10: 1–99.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. & Printzen, C. (2000) Proposal for a standardized nomenclature and characterization of insoluble lichen pigments. Lichenologist 32: 571–583.Google Scholar
Palice, Z. (1999) New and noteworthy records of lichens in the Czech Republic [Nové a pozoruhodné lisejniky v Ceské republice]. Preslia 71: 289–336.Google Scholar
Poelt, J. & Buschart, A. (1978) Über einige bemerkenswerte Flechten aus Norwegen. Norwegian Journal of Botany 25: 123–135.Google Scholar
Poelt, J. & Döbbeler, P. (1975) Über moosparasitische Arten der Flechtengattung Micarea und Vezdaea. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 96: 328–352.Google Scholar
Stenroos, S., Huhtinen, S., Lesonen, A., Palice, Z. & Printzen, C. (2009) Puttea gen. nov., erected for the enigmatic lichen Lecidea margaritella. Bryologist 112: 544–557.Google Scholar
Svensson, M. & Westberg, M. (2010) Additions to the lichen flora of Fennoscandia. Graphis Scripta 22: 33–37.Google Scholar
Thor, G. (2009) Micarea viridileprosa och M. botryoides i Sverige. Lavbulletinen 2009: 60–64.Google Scholar
Thor, G. & Svensson, M. (2008) Micarea tomentosa new to Sweden. Graphis Scripta 20: 28–30.Google Scholar