Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T02:05:05.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A key to the corticolous microfoliose, foliose and related crustose lichens from Rondônia, Brazil, with the description of four new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2014

André APTROOT
Affiliation:
ABL Herbarium, G.v.d.Veenstraat 107, NL-3762 XK Soest, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
Marcela Eugenia da Silva CÁCERES
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, CEP: 49500-000, Itabaiana, Sergipe, Brazil

Abstract

A key is given to the foliose and squamulose lichens known so far from Rondônia, including also corticolous crustose lichens with a chlorococcoid alga. The foliicolous Lecanorales found are also listed. The following four new corticolous Lecanorales are described from Rondônia: Calopadia granulosa with a granular, corticate thallus and ascospores 1 per ascus, 33–38×10·5–13·0 µm; Crustospathula amazonica with irregularly capitate to nearly globose, c. 0·2–0·4 mm diam. soralia on cartilaginous stalks; Flavoparmelia plicata with a thallus containing usnic and protocetraric acids, with laminal, irregular, globose to cylindrical isidia which are often easily abraded and showing the whitish medulla, but not sorediate or postulate; Physcidia striata with ascending squamules, without hypothallus, often with laminal isidia in defined areas towards lobe tips of some, usually sterile lobes, and often with biatorine apothecia with ascospores simple to 1-septate, (6·2–)7·5–10·0×(2·5–)3·0–3·5 µm. In the whole lichen flora of the lowland rainforest region of Rondônia, the following traits can be discerned: foliose lichens amount to only 17 species (2·7% of nearly 600), 33 (5·5%) are squamulose, while the vast majority (91·8%) are crustose. Cyanobacteria are present in only 6 (1%) species. A chlorococcoid alga present in c. 100 (16%), 12 of which (2%) have a myrmecioid alga. The remainder of the species, a staggering 83%, have trentepohlioid alga, including 6 (1%) with Phycopeltis. In neotropical lowland rainforest, the vast majority of the lichens are crustose and contain a trentepohlioid alga, and the Arthoniales, Graphidaceae and pyrenocarpous lichens are the main groups, each accounting for roughly a quarter of the lichen biodiversity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aptroot, A. (1998) New lichens and lichen records from Papua New Guinea, with the description of Crustospathula, a new genus in the Bacidiaceae . Tropical Bryology 14: 2534.Google Scholar
Aptroot, A. & Cáceres, M. E. S. (2013) Pyrenocarpous lichens (except Trypetheliaceae) in Rondônia. Lichenologist 45: 763785.Google Scholar
Aptroot, A. & Cáceres, M. E. S. (2014) New lichen species from termite nests in rainforest in Brazilian Rondônia and adjacent Amazonas. Lichenologist 46: 365372.Google Scholar
Aptroot, A. & Schumm, F. (2009) A new species of the lichen genus Crustospathula from the Philippines. Herzogia 22: 6770.Google Scholar
Aptroot, A., Sipman, H. J. M. & Cáceres, M. E. S. (2013) Twenty-one new species of Pyrenula from South America, with a note on over-mature ascospores. Lichenologist 45: 169198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brako, L. (1991) Phyllopsora (Bacidiaceae). Flora Neotropica 55: 166.Google Scholar
Cáceres, M. E. S. (2007) Corticolous crustose and microfoliose lichens of northeastern Brazil. Libri Botanici 22: 1168.Google Scholar
Cáceres, M. E. S., Aptroot, A., Parnmen, S., Lumbsch, H. T. & Lücking, R. (2014 a) Remarkable diversity in Graphidaceae in Rondônia, Brazil. Phytotaxa (in press).Google Scholar
Cáceres, M. E. S., Aptroot, A. & Ertz, D. (2014 b) New species and interesting records of Arthoniales from the Amazon, Rondônia, Brazil. Lichenologist 46: 573588.Google Scholar
Hale, M. E. (1976) A monograph of the lichen genus Pseudoparmelia Lynge (Parmeliaceae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 31: 162.Google Scholar
Kalb, K. (2011) Lichenes Neotropici. Fascikel XIV (No. 576–600). Schedae. Neumarkt: published by the author.Google Scholar
Kalb, K. & Elix, J. A. (1995) The lichen genus Physcidia . Bibliotheca Lichenologica 57: 265296.Google Scholar
Kalb, K. & Vězda, A. (1987) Einige nicht-foliicole Arten der familie Ectolechiaceae (Lichenes) aus Brasilien. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica, Praha 22: 287312.Google Scholar
Kalb, K., Buaruang, K., Mongkolsuk, P. & Boonpragob, K. (2012) New or otherwise interesting lichens. VI, including a lichenicolous fungus. Phytotaxa 42: 3547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lücking, R. (2008) Foliicolous lichenized fungi. Flora Neotropica 103: 1866.Google Scholar
Lücking, R., Seavey, F., Common, R. S., Beeching, S. Q., Breuss, O., Buck, W. R., Crane, L., Hodges, M., Hodkinson, B. P., Lay, E., et al. (2011) The lichens of Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park, Florida: Proceedings from the 18th Tuckerman Workshop. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History 49: 127186.Google Scholar
Lumbsch, H. T., Ahti, T., Altermann, S., Amo de Paz, G., Aptroot, A., Arup, U., Bárcenas Peña, A., Bawingan, P. A., Benatti, M. N., Betancourt, L., et al. (2011) One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: a signature of undiscovered global diversity. Phytotaxa 18: 1127.Google Scholar
Orange, A., James, P. W. & White, F. J. (2001) Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Timdal, E. (2008) Studies on Phyllopsora (Bacidiaceae) in Peru. Lichenologist 40: 337362.Google Scholar
Timdal, E. (2011) The lichen genus Phyllopsora (Bacidiaceae) in the West Indies. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 106: 319351.Google Scholar