Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:20:12.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

amator concordiae, ornator patriae. The Latinisation of Punic titles in early imperial Lepcis Magna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2020

Caroline Barron
Caroline Barron*
Affiliation:
Leverhulme Early Career Fellow Birkbeck, University of London 26 Russell Square LondonWC1B [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The translation of so-called ‘honorific’ titles from Punic to Latin, and their deployment in a number of public monumental inscriptions in Lepcis Magna, have often been promoted as evidence for successful Romanisation in the cities of Tripolitania. Titles such as amator concordiae and ornator patriae have been understood as affirmations that the local Lepcitan community had engaged with Augustan ideological concepts and were using them to demonstrate loyalty and support for the principate. This paper argues that a more likely influence on the translation of the titles into Latin came from the notions of philia exhibited by the Greek-speaking communities of the eastern Mediterranean in their interactions with Rome.

ن ترجمة ما يسمى بالألقاب ”الشرفية“ من اللغة البونية إلى اللاتينية، و استعمالها في عدد من النقوش الأثرية العامة في لبدة الكبرى، تم الترويج له غالباً على أنه دليل على نجاح الرومنة (Romanisation) في مدن إقليم تريبوليتانيا. عناوين مثل محب الوئام amator concordiae و مزين البلد ornator patriae تم فهمها على أنها تأكيد على أن مجتمع لبدة المحلي قد شارك المفاهيم الإيديولوجية لأوغسطس، و كان يستخدمها في إثبات ولائه و دعمه للحاكم. تناقش هذه الورقة أن التأثير الأكثر احتمالاً على ترجمة العناوين إلى اللاتينية جاء من مفاهيم المحبة و الأخوة (philia) التي أبدتها المجتمعات الناطقة باللغة اليونانية في شرق البحر الأبيض المتوسط في تعاملاتها مع روما.

Type
Part 1: Research Papers
Information
Libyan Studies , Volume 51 , November 2020 , pp. 10 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Libyan Studies 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement no. 614 424. It was conducted within the framework of the ERC project JUDAISM AND ROME, under the auspices of the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) and Aix-Marseille University, UMR 7297 TDMAM (Aix-en-Provence, France). Versions of this paper were given at the Theorizing Contacts conference at Edinburgh University in 2017, and at research seminars at the CNRS (Aix-Marseille) and the Institute of Classical Studies (London) in 2018; my thanks to the organisers of and participants in those events. My thanks also to Dr Aitor Blanco-Perez, Dr Benjamin Gray, Dr Niccolò Mugnai and Dr Christopher Siwicki who all read drafts of this article and offered essential feedback. Professor Charlotte Roueché has supported my interest in these inscriptions since 2009, when she involved me in the digital republication of Inscriptions of Roman Tripolitania. I am forever indebted to her generosity then and continued support today.

References

Adams, J. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akar, P. 2013. Concordia: un ideal de la classe dirigeante à la fin de la République. Publications de la Sorbonne, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amadasi Guzzo, M.G. 2005. Les phases du Phénicien: Phénicien et Punique. In Fronzaroli, P. and Marrassini, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of Hamito-Semitic (Afroasiatic) Linguistics (Florence, 18–20 April 2001). Università di Firenze, Florence: 95–103Google Scholar
Amadasi Guzzo, M.G. 1986. L'onomastica nelle iscrizioni puniche Tripolitane. Rivista dei Studi Fenici 14, 1: 21–51.Google Scholar
Balzat, J.S. 2019. The Diffusion of Roman Names and Naming Practices in Greek Poleis (2nd c. BC–3rd c. AD). In Parker, R. (ed.), Changing Names: tradition and innovation in ancient Greek onomastics. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, Frank L. 1972. Personal Names in the Phoenician and Punic Inscriptions. Biblical Institute Press, Rome.Google Scholar
Bertinelli Angeli, M. G. 1970. Nomenclatura pubblica e sacra di Roma nelle epigrafi semitiche. Istituto di storia antica e scienze ausiliari, Genova.Google Scholar
Beschaouch, A. 2004. Uthina et l’Équité d'Auguste. In H. Ben Hassen and L. Maurin (eds.), Oudhna (Uthina), colonie de vétérans de la XIIIe légion. Histoire, urbanisme, fouilles et mise en valeur des monuments. Ausonius, Bordeaux: 15–22.Google Scholar
Bianchi, F. 2005. La decorazione architettonica in pietra locale a Lepis Magna tra il I e il II sec. d.c. Archeologia Classica 56: 189–223.Google Scholar
Bigi, F. 2006. I capitelli di Leptis Magna fra modelli italici e influenze alessandrine. In Akerraz, A., Ruggieri, P., Siraj, A. and Vismara, C. (eds.), L'Africa Romana. Mobilità delle persone e dei popoli dinamiche migratorie, emigrazioni ed immigrazioni nelle province occidentali dell'Impero romano. Carocci Editore, Roma: 2351–2375.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. 1988. Names at Lepcis Magna. Libyan Studies 19: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, C. 2006. Identité et altérité religeuses. À propos de l'hellénisation de Carthage. In François, P., Moret, P. and Péré-Noguès, S. (eds.), L'Hellénisation en méditerranée occidentale: au temps des guerres puniques (260–180 av. J.-C.): Actes du Colloque international de Toulouse 31 mars – 2 avril 2005. Presses universitaires du Mirail, Toulouse: 365–379.Google Scholar
Braund, D. 1984. Rome and the Friendly King: the character of the client kingship. St. Martin's Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
Caputo, G. 1987. Il teatro augusteo di Leptis Magna: scavo e restauro (1937-1951). L'Erma Di Bretschneider, Roma.Google Scholar
Cooley, A. 2012. The Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwell, H. 2017. Pax and the Politics of Peace. Republic to Principate. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Vita, A. 1982. Gli Emporia di Tripolitania dall’ età di Massinissa a Diocleziano: un profilo storico-istituzionale. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 10.2: 515–595.Google Scholar
Di Vita, A., Di Vita-Everard, G. and Bacchielli, L. 1999. Libya: the lost cities of the Roman Empire. Könemann, Cologne.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.L. 1999. La liberté des cités et ses limites à l'époque républicaine. Mediterraneo Antico 2.1: 69–84.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.L. 2008. L'onomastique dans les provinces orientales de l'empire à la lumière du dossier des mémoriaux de délégations de Claros. Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 19: 247-278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Février, J. 1966. Inscriptions puniques et neo-puniques. In Galand, L., Février, J. and Vajda, G. Inscriptions antiques du Maroc, I. Inscriptions libyques - Inscriptions puniques et néopuniques - Inscriptions hébraïques des sites antiques. CNRS: Paris: 81–132.Google Scholar
Fontana, S. 2001. Leptis Magna. The Romanization of a Major African City through Burial Evidence. In Keay, S. and Terrenato, N. (eds.), Italy and the West. Comparative Issues in Romanisation. Oxbow, Oxford: 161–172.Google Scholar
Gaggiotti, M. 1990. Considerazioni sulla “punicità” del macellum romano. L'Africa Romana 7: 783–792.Google Scholar
Giardina, A. 1988. Amor Civicus. Formule e immagini dell'evergetismo Romano nella tradizione epigrafica. In Donati, A. (ed.), La terza età dell'epigrafia: Colloquio AIEGL-Borghesi 86, Bologna, ottobre 1986. Fratelli Lega, Faenza: 67–87.Google Scholar
Gray, B. 2017. Reconciliation in later Classical and post-Classical Greek cities. In Moloney, E.P. and Williams, M.S. (eds.), Peace and Reconciliation in the Classical World. Routledge, London: 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerber, é. 2009. Les cités grecques dans l'Empire romain. Les privilèges et les titres des cités de l'Orient hellénophone d'Octave Auguste à Dioclétien. Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Heller, A. 2017. Priesthoods and Civic Ideology: Honorific Titles for Hiereis and Archiereis in Roman Asia Minor. In Muñiz Grijalvo, E., Cortés Copete, J. M. and Lozano Gómez, F. (eds.), Empire and Religion: Religious Change in Greek Cities under Roman Rule. Brill, Leiden/Boston: 1–20.Google Scholar
Hock, H.H. and Joseph, B. 1996. Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship. An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. De Gruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar
Hoftijzer, J. and Jongeling, K. 1995, Dictionary of The North-West Seminitic Inscriptions. Brill, Leiden, New York, Köln.Google Scholar
IPT = Levi della Vida, G. and Amadasi Guzzo, M.G. 1987. Iscrizioni puniche della Tripolitania, 1927–1967. L'Erma di Bretschneider, Roma.Google Scholar
IRT2009 = Reynolds, J.M. and Ward-Perkins, J. B. 1952. Inscriptions of Roman Tripolitania. British School at Rome, Rome. Enhanced electronic reissue by Bodard, G. and Roueché, C. 2009. Available: http://inslib.kcl.ac.uk/irt2009/ (accessed 19 May 2020).Google Scholar
Jongeling, K. 2008. Handbook of Neo-Punic Inscriptions. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Khanoussi, M. 2008. Dougga. Agence de mise en valeur du patrimoine et de promotion culturelle, Tunis.Google Scholar
Levi della Vida, G. 1935. Il teatro augusteo di Leptis Magna secondo le ultime scoperte e un'iscrizione bilingue in latino e neo-punico. Africa Italiana 6, 3–4: 104–109.Google Scholar
Loburm, J. A. 2008. Consensus, Concordia and the Formation of Roman Imperial Ideology. Routledge, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMullen, R. 2000. Romanization in the time of Augustus. Yale, New Haven.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. 2011. Imperialism, Power and Identity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. 1995. Tripolitania. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Mokni, S. 2008. Les premiers temps de la Carthage romain et la titulature de la colonie. Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 19: 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugnai, N. 2020. Architectural ornament in Tripolitania, North Africa and beyond: some remarks on research approaches and interpretation. Quaderni di Archeologia della Libia, 23.Google Scholar
Mullen, A. 2012. Introduction. Multiple languages, multiple identities. In Mullen, A. and James, P. (eds.), Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman Worlds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, A. 2011. Latin and Other Languages: Societal and Individual Bilingualism. In Clackson, J. (ed.), A Companion to the Latin Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 527–548.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, C. 2006. Multiple Voices. An Introduction to Bilingualism. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Quinn, J. 2013. Monumental Power: ‘Numidian Royal Architecture’ in Context. In Quinn, J. and Prag, J. (eds.), The Hellenistic West: Rethinking the Ancient Mediterranean. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, J. 2010. The Reinvention of Lepcis. Bollettino di Archeologia Online, Volume Speciale (Proceedings of the 2008 AIAC Congress, 2010, published online): 52–69.Google Scholar
Papi, E. 2014. Punic Mauretania? In Quinn, J. and Vella, N.C. (eds.), The Punic Mediterranean: identities and identification from Phoenician settlement to Roman rule. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 202–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pera, R. 1984. Homonoia sulle monete da Augusto agli Antonini: studio storico-tipologico. Il Melangolo, Genova.Google Scholar
Price, S. R. F. 1985, Rituals and Power. The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Raggi, A. 2010. The First Roman Citizens among Eastern Dynasts and Kings. In Kaizer, T. and Facella, M. (eds.), Kingdoms and Principalities in the Roman near East. Franz Steiner Verlag Wiesbaden GmbH, Stuttgart: 81–97.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. 1978. Concordia and Concordia Augusta. Rome and Pompeii. Parola del Passato 33: 260–272.Google Scholar
Robert, L. 1965. Hellenica : recueil d'épigraphie, de numismatique et d'antiquités grecques. Vol. XIII, D'Aphrodisias à la Lycaonie : Compte rendu du volume VIII des Monumenta Asiae Minoris Antiqua. Librairie d'Amérique et d'Orient, Adrien-Maisonneuve, Paris.Google Scholar
Rocco, G. 2010. Tradizione locale e influssi esterni nei tre templi giulio-claudii del Foro Vecchio di Leptis Magna. Bollettino di Archaeologia Online I, Volume Speciale A (Proceedings of the 2008 AIAC Congress, 2010, published online): 22–36.Google Scholar
Romanelli, P. 1925. Leptis Magna. Societa Editrice d'Arte Illustrata, Roma.Google Scholar
de Romilly, J. 1972. Vocabulaire et Propagande ou les Premiers Emplois du mot ὁμόνοια. In Melanges de Linguistique et de Philologie Grecques offerts à Pierre Chantraine. Klincksieck, Paris: 109-209Google Scholar
Roueché, C. 1984. Acclamations in the Later Roman Empire: New Evidence from Aphrodisias. Journal of Roman Studies 74: 181-199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Ruyt, C. 1983. Macellum: marché alimentaire des romains. Institut supérieur d'archéologie et d'histoire de l'art, Collège Érasme, Louvain-la-Neuve.Google Scholar
Salomies, O. 1987. Die römischen Vornamen: Studien zur römischen Namengebung. Societas scientiarum Fennica, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Salway, B. 1994. What's in a Name? A Survey of Roman Onomastic Practice from c. 700 B.C. to A.D. 700. Journal of Roman Studies 84: 124–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sear, F. 2006. Roman Theatres. An Architectural Study. Oxford Monographs on Classical Archaeology, Oxford.Google Scholar
Shapiro, H. A. 1981. Homonoia. In Ackermann, H.C. (ed.), Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae (LIMC), vol. 5 (Herakles-Kenchrias). Artemis-Verlag, Zurich: 476–479.Google Scholar
Stucchi, S. 1987. L'architettura funeraria suburbana cirenaica in rapport a quella della chora viciniore ed a quella Libya ulteriore, con speciale riguardo all'età ellenistica. Quaderni di archeologia della Libia 12: 249–377.Google Scholar
Thériault, G. 1996. L'apparition du culte d'Homonoia. Maison de l'Orient méditerranéen, Lyon.Google Scholar
Thraede, K. 1994. Homonoia (Eintracht). Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum 16: 176–289.Google Scholar
Veligianni, C. 2001. Philos und philos-Komposita in den griechischen Inschriften der Kaiserzeit. In Peachin, M. and Caldelli, M.L. (eds.), Aspects of friendship in the Graeco-Roman world : proceedings of a conference held at the Seminar für Alte Geschichte, Heidelberg, on 10-11 June, 2000. Journal of Roman Archaeology. Supplementary Series 43: 63–80.Google Scholar
Versluys, M.J. 2017. Visual Style and Constructing Identity in the Hellenistic World. Nemrud Dag and Commagene under Antiochus I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome's Cultural Revolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. 2012. Neo-Punic and Latin Inscriptions in Roman North Africa. Function and Display. In Mullen, A. and James, P. (eds.), Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman Worlds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 265–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Barron Supplementary Materials

Appendix - Lepcis Magna - 2021
Download Barron Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 272.4 KB