Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:20:31.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reinterpretation of Latino-Punic Inscriptions from Roman Tripolitania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

A. F. Elmayer
A. F. Elmayer*
Affiliation:
University College, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nine Latino-Punic inscriptions from Roman Tripolitania are discussed in detail, and their wider context discussed. Not only do they attest to the prevalence of the Punic language in Roman Tripolitania, but also provide interesting data about the Neo-Punic language. They also shed light on the history of the ancient Roman province of Tripolitania and the Roman military and civil organisation in the zone of the ‘limes’.

Type
Articles
Information
Libyan Studies , Volume 15 , 1984 , pp. 93 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Libyan Studies 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartoccini, R. 1927. Africa Italiana 1: 232–236.Google Scholar
Beguinot, F. 1949. Di alcune iscrizioni in caratteri latini e in lingua sconosciuta, trovante in Tripolitania. Rivista degli Studi Orientalia XXIV: 14–19.Google Scholar
CIL. Corpus Inscriptionem Latinarum.Google Scholar
CIS. Corpus Inscriptionem Semiticarum.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. A. 1903. A Text Book of North-Semitic Inscriptions. Oxford.Google Scholar
di Vita, A. 1964. Il limes romano di Tripolitania nella sua concretezza archeologica e nella sua realta storica. Libya Antiqua 1: 65–98.Google Scholar
Elmayer, A. F. 1983. The Reinterpretation of Latino-Punic inscriptions from Roman Tripolitania. Libyan Studies 14: 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidrich, J. 1970. Phonizische grammatik. Rome.Google Scholar
Garbini, G. 1975. Dieci anni di epigraphia punica nel Magreb (1965–1974). Studi Magrebini 6: 1–13.Google Scholar
Goodchild, R. G. 1950. The Latino-Libyan inscriptions of Tripolitania. Antiquaries Journal 30: 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodchild, R. G. 1951. Roman sites on the Tarhuna plateau of Tripolitania. Papers of the British School at Rome 19: 43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodchild, R. G. 1954. La necropoli Romano-Libica di Bir Ed-Dreder. Quaderni di Archeologia delta Libia 3: 91–107.Google Scholar
Goodchild, R. G. 1976. Libyan Studies: Selected Papers of the Late R. G. Goodchild (Edited by Reynolds, J. M.), London, Elek.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. 1971. Hanno's Punic speech in the Poenulus of Plaubus. Hermes 99: 24–45.Google Scholar
Hoftijzer, Ch. F. J. 1960. Dictionnaire des Inscriptions Semitiques de l'Ouest. Leiden.Google Scholar
IRT. See Reynolds and Ward-Perkins 1952.Google Scholar
Krahmalkov, C. R. 1970. Studies in Phoenician and Punic grammar. Journal of Semitic Studies 15: 185–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahmalkov, C. R. 1972. Comments on the vocalisation of the suffix of pronoun of the third feminine singular in Phoenician and Punic. Journal of Semitic Studies 17: 73–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahmalkov, C. R. 1973. A reinterpretation of the Neo-Punic inscription IRT 889 from Roman Tripolitania. Journal of the American Oriental Society 93: 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krahmalkov, C. R. 1976. A neopunic shaft tomb inscription from Roman Tripolitania. Michigan Oriental Studies: 57–63.Google Scholar
Levi della Vida, G. 1927. Le inscrizioni neopuniche della Tripolitania. Rivista delta Tripolitania 3: 91–116.Google Scholar
Levi della Vida, G. 1949. Le inscrizioni neopuniche della Tripolitania. Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionali del Lincei 8, 4: 399–412.Google Scholar
Levi della Vida, G. 1951. The Neo-Punic dedication of the Ammonium al Ras el-Haddagia. Papers of the British School at Rome 19: 65–68.Google Scholar
Levi della Vida, G. 1963a. Le inscrizioni neopuniche della Tripolitania. Oriens Antiquus 2: 3–94.Google Scholar
Levi della Vida, G. 1963b. Le inscrizioni neopuniche della Tripolitania. Rendiconti della Accademia Nazionali del Lincei 8, 18: 407–410.Google Scholar
Levi della Vida, G. 1964. Le inscrizioni neopuniche di wadi el-Amud. Libya Antiqua 1: 57–63.Google Scholar
Levi della Vida, G. 1967. Le inscrizioni neopuniche della Tripolitania. Annali dell'Instituto Orientate di Napoli 17: 257–259.Google Scholar
Polselli, G. C. 1976. Atti del'l Convegno Italiano sul vicino oriente antico. Coll. XIII, Roma (22-25 Aprille, 1976): 231–41.Google Scholar
Polselli, G. C. 1979. A proposite di alcune iscrizioni Latino-puniche. Studi Magrebini 11: 37–49.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. M. 1955. Inscriptions of Roman Tripolitania: a supplement. Papers of the British School at Rome 23: 124–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J. M. and Brogan, O. 1960. Seven new inscriptions from Tripolitania. Papers of the British School at Rome 28: 51–54.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. M. and Ward-Perkins, J. B. 1952. Inscriptions of Roman Tripolitania. Rome and London (=IRT).Google Scholar
Schroder, P. 1869. Punischest texte poenulus dans die phonizische sprache, Hale.Google Scholar
Sznycer, M. 1965. Groupe Linguistique d'Etude Chamito-Semitiques Comptes Rendus 10: 37–55.Google Scholar
Sznycer, M. 1967. Les Passages Puniques en Transcription Latine dans le Poenulus de Plaute. Paris.Google Scholar
Vattioni, F. 1966. Annali del' Universita di Napoli 16: 39–41.Google Scholar
Vattioni, F. 1971. Excerta aramaica, Frustula epigraphica II. Epigraphica Aramaica 11: 173–90.Google Scholar
Vattioni, F. 1976. Glosse Puniche. Augustinianum 16: 536–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar