Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:36:06.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amphora Production in the Tripolitanian Gebel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

P. Arthur
P. Arthur*
Affiliation:
The British School at Rome
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper presents the results of an examination of two Roman kiln sites located by the late R. G. Goodchild, at Tazzoli and Ain Scersciara in the Gebel. They produced amphorae of forms Tripolitana I-III together with coarse wares and tiles. The material is described and illustrated, and the fabrics are examined petrologically as a guide to identification.

Type
Articles
Information
Libyan Studies , Volume 13 , 1982 , pp. 61 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Libyan Studies 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Camps-Fabrer, H. 1953. L'Olivier et l'Huile dans l'Afrique Romaine. Algiers.Google Scholar
Cowper, H. S. 1897. The Hill of the Graces - The Trilithons and Megalithic Sites of Tripoli. London.Google Scholar
Dragendorff, H. 1895. Terra-Sigillata. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der griechischen und römischen Keramik. Bonner Jahrbücher 96: 18–155.Google Scholar
Fentress, E. W. B. 1979. Numidia and the Roman Army. Oxford, BAR International Series 53.Google Scholar
Goodchild, R. G. 1950. Roman Tripolitania: Reconnaisance in the Desert Frontier Zone. In Goodchild, 1976, 2–16.Google Scholar
Goodchild, R. G. 1957. Roman Sites on the Tarhuna Plateau of Tripolitania. In Goodchild, 1976, 72–106.Google Scholar
Goodchild, R. G. 1976. Libyan Studies: Selected Papers of the late R. G. Goodchild (Edited by Reynolds, J. M.). London, Elek.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. W. 1972. Late Roman Pottery. London, The British School at Rome.Google Scholar
Haynes, D. E. L. 1959. The Antiquities of Tripolitania. London.Google Scholar
Manacorda, D. 1977. Testimonianze sulla produzione e il consumo dell' olio tripolitano nel III secolo. Dialoghi di Archeologia IX–X, 1–2: 542–601.Google Scholar
Maña de Angulo, J. M. 1951. Sobre Tipologia de anforas punicas. In Chronica del VI Congreso Arqueologico del Sudeste (Alcoy 1950).Google Scholar
Mayet, F. 1978. Marques d'Amphores de Mauretanie Tingitane. Mélanges de l'Ecole Francaise de Rome - Antiquité 90, 1: 357–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. L. 1899. The Age and Purpose of the Megalithic Structures of Tripoli. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London Second series, 17: 280–293.Google Scholar
Oates, D. 1953. The Tripolitanian Gebel: Settlement of the Roman Period around Gasr Ed-Dauun. Papers of the British School at Rome 21: 81–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palma, B. and Panella, C. 1968. Anfore. In Carandini, A. and Panella, C. (eds.), Ostia I Studi Miscellanei 13. Rome. 97–116.Google Scholar
Panella, C. 1973. Le Anfore. In Carandini, A. and Panella, C. (eds.) Ostia III Studi Miscellanei 21. Rome460–696.Google Scholar
Panella, C. 1977. Anfore Tripolitane a Pompei. In Carandini, A. (ed.) L'Instrumentum Domesticum di Ercolano e Pompei nella prima etá imperiale Quaderni di Cultura Materiale I. Rome. 135–149.Google Scholar
Peacock, D. P. S. 1977. Recent Discoveries of Roman Amphora Kilns in Italy. The Antiquaries Journal 57: 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. A., forthcoming. The Coarse pottery from Berenice. In Lloyd, J. A. (ed.), Sidi Khrebish Excavations, Benghazi (Berenice), Vol. II, Tripoli: 91–467.Google Scholar
Shepard, A. O. 1958. Ceramics for the Archaeologist. New York.Google Scholar
Siena, S. L. 1977. Appunti su alcuni tipi di anfore Iunensi. In Méthodes Classiques et Méthodes Formelles dans l'Etude des Amphores. Rome, L'Ecole Française de Rome: 207–230.Google Scholar
Wild, J. P. 1973. A Fourth-Century Potter's Workshop and Kiln at Stibbington, Peterborough. In Detsicas, A. (ed.) Current Research in Romano-British Coarse Pottery. CBA Research Report 10. London. 135–137.Google Scholar