Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:46:20.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is Critical Research in International Law? Celebrating Structuralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

MARTTI KOSKENNIEMI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay is a friendly response to the colloquium on From Apology to Utopia (FATU). It restates the way critical research examines the exercise of power through analysis of (legal) language. Attention is directed especially to the empowering and enchanting effects of the law. The main point has to do with the continuing power of structuralism as a form of legal analysis.

Keywords

critical theoryFrom Apology to Utopialegal professionalismstructuralism
Type
INTERNATIONAL LEGAL THEORY: Symposium on Martti Koskenniemi's From Apology to Utopia
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 727 - 735
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 These different languages (‘justice’, ‘coherence’, ‘validity’, ‘effectiveness’ and so on) mark some of the internal divisions (or better, ‘positions’) through which the academic world of rule and policy-production organizes itself. None of them is better or worse than the others. They are just different ways of conceiving what ‘academic work’ in the field of law might be. They all have their different criteria of excellence, their traditions, standard-bearers and regular troops. Their ways of attack and defence against each other are well-known and constantly reproduced as part of the ‘structure’ of work in the legal academy.

2 d'Aspremont, J., ‘Martti Koskenniemi, the Mainstream, and Self-Reflectivity’, (2016) 29 LJIL 625–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Rasulov, A., ‘ From Apology to Utopia and The Inner Life of International Law’, (2016) 29 LJIL 641–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Ibid.

5 Desautels-Stein, J., ‘ From Apology to Utopia’s Point of Attack’, (2016) 29 LJIL 677–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Ibid.

7 Singh, S., ‘Koskenniemi's Images of the International Lawyer’, (2016) 29 LJIL 699–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Haskell, J., ‘ From Apology to Utopia’s Conditions of Possibility’, (2016) 29 LJIL 667–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.