Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:01:25.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oil's Well that Ends Well? Critical Comments on the Merits Judgement in the Oil Platforms Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2004

Abstract

The recent judgement on the merits in the Oil Platforms case has brought a long-standing dispute before the International Court of Justice to a close. This article critically analyzes some of the most interesting topics raised in this judgement, not least the fact that it was harshly criticized by a very high number of judges in their individual opinions. The issues discussed – such as the role of self-defence law within the confines of an ‘FCN treaty’ or the notion of ‘freedom of commerce’ – merely point to higher-level problems of a theoretical nature which cause our confusion as to substantive law.

Type
HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS: International Court of Justice
Copyright
© 2004 Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)