Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:40:20.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2005

Abstract

Successive ICJ Presidents have expressed concern about the proliferation of international tribunals and substantive fragmentation of international law. This is not a new phenomenon. International law has always lacked a clear normative and institutional hierarchy. The problem is more how new institutions have used international law to further new interests, especially those not predominant in traditional law. The anxiety among ICJ judges should be seen less as a concern for abstract “coherence” than a worry about the demise of traditional principles of diplomatic law and the Court's privileged role as their foremost representative. As jurisdictional conflicts reflect divergent political priorities, it is unclear that administrative co-ordination can eliminate them. This does not, however, warrant excessive worries over fragmentation; it is an institutional expression of political pluralism internationally.

Type
HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS: International Court of Justice
Copyright
© 2002 Kluwer Law International

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)