Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T00:30:19.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concluding Observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

Stephen M. Schwebel ,
Marcel Brus  and
Albert Jan van den Berg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Concluding Observations
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 6 , Issue 2: Special Issue 1993: THE FLAME REKINDLED: New Hopes for International Arbitration , August 1993 , pp. 375 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. One of the arbitrators even being a former President of the ICJ, see Klöckner v. Cameroon, decision of May 3,1985, reported in XI Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 162–184 (1986).

2. See, e.g., UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Article 33(2); Statute of the International Court of Justice, Article 38(2).

3. See my article The Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Peace Palace, The Hague – A New Role for International Commercial Arbitration?, in Law and Reality – Essays on National and International Procedural Law, Liber Amicorum A. Voskuil 19–25 (1992).