We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
1 Books
Cunliffe, E. and Fox, P. (eds.), Safeguarding Cultural Property and the 1954 Hague Convention: All Possible Steps (2022). ISBN 9781783276660, xxi, 285 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujishige, H.N., Uesugi, Y. and Honda, T., Japan”s Peacekeeping at a Crossroads: Taking a Robust Stance or Remaining Hesitant? (2022). e-ISBN 9783030885090, xxv, 236 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttry, A. de, Frulli, M., Casolari, F. and Poli, L. (eds.), International Law and Chemical, Biological, Radio-Nuclear (CBRN) Events: Towards an All-Hazards Approach (2022). ISBN 9789004507982, xxiii, 665 pp.Google Scholar
Gilder, A., Stabilization and Human Security in UN Peace Operations (2022). ISBN 9780367673949, xii, 197 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holá, L., Urbanová, M., Večeřa, M., Fiedor, D. and Holas, J., Mediation in the Reflection of Law and Society: European Perspectives (2022). ISBN 9789403542140, xxv, 214 pp.Google Scholar
Jackson, A., Who saved Antarctica? The Heroic Era of Antarctic Diplomacy (2021). ISBN 9783030784041, xviii, 424 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabou, P., Le droit de la guerre dans les religions et traditions d’Afrique (2022). ISBN 9782343242187, 284 pp.Google Scholar
Kurze, A. and Lamont., C.K., Mapping Global Justice: Perspectives, Cases and Practice (2023). ISBN 9780367699086, viii, 283 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, M., The Peacekeeping Failure in South Sudan: the UN, Bias and the Peacekeeper’s Mind (2022). ISBN 9781350273849, xiii, 204 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, P.R., Die neue Weltunordnung: wie sich der Westen selbst zerstört (2022). ISBN 9783737101417, 329 pp.Google Scholar
Petersmann, M.-C., When Environmental Protection and Human Rights Collide: the Politics of Conflict Management by Regional Courts (2022). ISBN 9781316515808, xvi, 288 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayapin, S., Atadjanov, R., Kadam, U., Kemp, G., Zambrana-Tévar, N., Quénivet, N. (eds.)Google Scholar
International Conflict and Security Law: a Research Handbook (2022). ISBN 9789462655140, 2 volumes, xxxi, 1497 pp.Google Scholar
2 Chapters in Edited Volumes and Journal Articles
Altmann, J., Pilch, M. and Suter, D., ‘Small Armed Aircraft and Missiles - Dangers for International Security’, (2022) 95Die Friedens-Warte: Blätter für internationale Verständigung und zwischenstaatliche Organisation316–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branca, E., ‘Complicity of States in Partnered Drone Operations’, (2022) 27Journal of Conflict and Security Law253–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuerth, Brunk, I. and Hakimi, M., ‘Russia, Ukraine, and the Future World Order’, (2022) 116American Journal of International Law687–697Google Scholar
Bultrini, A., ‘The cross-strait relationship between China and Taiwan in light of international law: not quite a mere domestic affair…’, (2022) 9 Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 391–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, C, ‘China and International Security: How Law and Politics Work’, (2023) 64German Yearbook of International Law = Jahrbuch für internationales Recht117–146Google Scholar
Camins, E., ‘Casting a Legal Safety Net: A Human Security Approach to Assisting Families Following Armed Conflict’, (2022) 55Israel Law Review215–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G., ‘Mixing oil and water? The interaction between jus ad bellum and jus in bello during armed conflicts’, (2022) 9Journal on the Use of Force and International Law352–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M., Gordon, H., Lambert, H. and McAdam, J., ‘“Time” in Refugee Status Determination in Australia and the United Kingdom: A Clear and Present Danger from Armed Conflict?’, (2022) 34International Journal of Refugee Law163–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzebyk, P., ‘Escalation of the Conflict Between Russia and Ukraine in 2022 in Light of the Law on Use of Force and International Humanitarian Law’, (2021) 41Polish Yearbook of International Law145–162Google Scholar
Harig, C. and Jenne, N., ‘Whose rules? Whose power? The Global South and the Possibility to shape International Peacekeeping Norms through Leadership Appointments’, (2022) 48Review of International Studies646–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liguori, A., ‘Overlap Between Complicity and Positive Obligations: What Advantages in Resorting to Positive Obligations in Case of Partnered Operations?’, (2022) 27Journal of Conflict and Security Law229–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundstedt, T., ‘How to Resolve the Territorial Conflicts in Ukraine: “Uti Possidetis Juris” and an International Law-Based Proposal for Power-Sharing’, (2021) 41Polish Yearbook of International Law163–191Google Scholar
Mamiya, R. and Vestner, T., ‘Revisiting the Law on UN Peace Operations’ Support to Partner Forces’, (2022) 27Journal of Conflict and Security Law211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, K.M., ‘Detaining the Short-Term: Assessing the Nature of “Interim” United Nations Peacekeeping Missions and Mandates’, (2022) 25Journal of International Peacekeeping283–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, S., ‘Trustworthy and Explainable: A European Vision of (Weaponised) Artificial Intelligence’, (2022) 95Die Friedens-Warte: Blätter für internationale Verständigung und zwischenstaatliche Organisation290–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trahan, J., ‘Vetoes and the UN Charter: the obligation to act in accordance with the “Purposes and Principles” of the United Nations’, (2022) 9Journal on the Use of Force and International Law243–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar