Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:19:39.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John Linarelli, Margot E. Salomon and Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah, The Misery of International Law: Confrontations with Injustice in the Global Economy, (2018), Oxford University Press, 304 pp, ISBN 9780198753957

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2019

Mohsen al Attar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
BOOK REVIEW
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 875 - 882
Copyright
© Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Associate Professor, School of Law, University of Warwick [[email protected]]

References

1 J. Linarelli, M. E. Salomon and M. Sornarajah, The Misery of International Law: Confrontations with Injustice in the Global Economy (2018).

2 A. Perry-Kessaris, ‘What Does It Mean to Take a Socio-Legal Approach to International Economic Law?’, in A. Perry-Kessaris (ed.) Socio-Legal Approaches to International Economic Law (2014).

3 Linarelli, Salomon and Sornarajah, supra note 1, at 12–13.

4 Ibid., at 1.

5 Ibid., at 111.

6 Ibid., at 114.

7 J. Thuo Gathii, War, Commerce, and International Law (2010).

8 Linarelli, Salomon and Sornarajah, supra note 1, at 147.

9 Ibid., at 155.

10 Ibid., at 156.

11 Ibid., at 171.

12 Ibid., at 151.

13 Ibid., at 182.

14 Ibid., at 183.

15 Ibid., at 186–7.

16 Ibid., at 190.

17 Ibid., at 197–201.

18 Ibid., at 38–9.

19 Ibid., at 44.

20 Ibid., at 51.

21 Ibid., at 53.

22 Ibid., at 55.

23 Ibid., at 58.

24 Ibid., at 60.

25 Ibid., at 65.

26 R. W. Tucker, The Inequality of Nations (1977), 161.

27 Linarelli, Salomon and Sornarajah, supra note 1, at 274.

28 Ibid., at 67–8.

29 Ibid., at 72.

30 Ibid., at 72–6.

31 Ibid., at 75–6.

32 Social Mobility Commission, ‘State of the Nation 2017: Social Mobility in Great Britain’, available at www.gov.uk/government/publications/state-of-the-nation-2017.

33 Linarelli, Salomon and Sornarajah, supra note 1, at 74.

34 Ibid., at 129.

35 Ibid.

36 Ibid., at 130.

37 Drahos, P. and Braithwaite, J., ‘Hegemony Based on Knowledge: The Role of Intellectual Property’, (2003) 21 Law in Context 204, at 215Google Scholar.

38 Linarelli, Salomon and Sornarajah, supra note 1, at 130.

39 Ibid., at 129.

40 Ibid.

41 Ibid., at 272.

42 Ibid., at 37.

43 Ibid.