Article contents
Immunity of a Former Head of State General Pinochet and the House of Lords: Part Three
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2004
Abstract
The third decision of the House of Lords in the Pinochet matter is significant, because the House of Lords upheld the majority view taken in the first decision: heads of state can, under certain circumstances, be held responsible for gross violations of human rights in the criminal courts of a foreign country. The decision is based on three main pillars. The Lords had, first, to clarify what constitutes an extradition crime under the Extradition Act 1989; second, to construct torture as an international crime; and, finally, to reject the plea of immunity of a former head of state in the context of the international crime of torture.
- Type
- CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2000 Kluwer Law International
- 1
- Cited by