No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Editorial Note
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 July 2009
Extract
In April of this year the 12th Telders International Law Moot Court Competition was held in the Peace Palace in the Hague. Teams from twelve European countries debated the issues concerning the “Right to Insurgency Case”, which was included in the last issue of the Leiden Journal of International Law. The winner of the 1989 Competition was the Team from the University of Leiden, the Netherlands. In the final round they took on the team from Germany, in the Great Hall of Justice at the Peace Palace, in front of Judge Jose Maria Ruda, Judge Manfred Lachs and Judge Sir Robert Jennings.
- Type
- Telders Moot Court Competition
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 1989
References
1. Cheng, B. General Principles of Law as applied by International Courts and Tribunals 180ff.(1953).Google Scholar
2. German Settlers in Poland Case, 1923 P.C.IJ. Ser. B No. 6,22 (advisory opinion).
3. Bolivar Railway Claim Case, 9 R.I.A.A. 445 at 449 (1903).
4. Rosenn, The Law and Practice of the International Court 580 (2nd. ed. 1985); See separate opinion of Judge Lauterpacht in the Norwegian Loans Case (U.S. v. Norway), 19571.C J. Rep. 39.Google Scholar
5. Asylum Case, 19501.CJ. Rep. 276.
6. U.S. Nationals in Morocco, 19521.CJ. Rep. 200.
7. Crawford, J. The Creation of States in International Law 118 (1979).Google Scholar
8. UN G.A. Res. 2625 (XXV), 24 October 1970, Declaration on the Principles of International Law Concerning the Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
9. UN S.C. Res. 353 (1974), U.N.SCOR, 29th Year, Resolutions and Decisions, at 7.
10. Lauterpacht, H. Recognition in International Law 73–74 (1947).Google Scholar
11. Cheng, B. General Principles of Law as applied by International Courts and Tribunals 190(1953);Google ScholarCharles, J.Jensen, v. Mexico, Case No. 81, in Moore, J.B. History of the International Arbitrations to which the United States has been a party, vol. 3, 2927 (1898).Google Scholar
12. Crawford, J. The Creation of States in International Law 411 (1979); The Case of Czechoslovakia 1968.Google Scholar
13. See Bank of Ethiopia v. National Bank of Egypt and Ligouri Ch.513 (1937) and Haile Salassie v. Cable and Wireless, Ltd. (no.2) Ch. 182. See also Brownlie, I. Principles of Public International Law 101–108(1979).Google Scholar
14. Art. 38(l)(d) Statute of the Court.
15. Tinoco Arbitration (Great Britain v. Costa Rica) 1 R.I.A.A. 369 (1923).
16. Y.B.I.L.C. 8 (1985).
17. Aerial Incident of July 27,1955 (U.S.A. v. Bulgaria) 19601.CJ. Rep. 146.
18. Interhandel Case (Switzerland v. U.S.A.) 1959 I.C J. Rep. 6.
19. Nationality Decrees in Tunis and Morocco Case, 1923 P.C.I.J. Rep. (Ser. B. No 2,24); Interpretation of Peace Treaties Case, 1978 I.C J. Rep. 25. See also, Waldock, C.H.M. The Plea of Domestic Jurisdiction before International Legal Tribunals 31 B.Y.I.L. 140 (1954);Google ScholarBrownly, supra note 13 ,at 291; Rosenne, supra note 4,393–395.Google Scholar
20. Resolution of the Institute of International Law, 45 Annuaire de l'institut II at 299 (1954); Nationality Decrees in Tunis and Morocco Case, 1923 P.C.I.J. Rep. (Ser. B No 4,24.
21. Oppenheim, International Law, vol. 1,153–154 (1952).
22. 61 A.J.I.L. 870 (1967).
23. See Harris, DJ. Cases and Materials on International Law 128–131 (1983).Google Scholar
24. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. U.S.A.), 1986 I.C.J. Rep. para. 188 and 191 (merits and judgment).
25. Nottebohm Case (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala) 1955 I.C.J. Rep. 21.