Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:25:09.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONTRASTIVE CAUSATION IN THE LAW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

Jonathan Schaffer
Jonathan Schaffer*
Affiliation:
Australian National [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What conception of causation is at work in the law? I argue that the law implicitly relies on a contrastive conception. In a liability case where the defendant's breach of duty must be shown to have caused the plaintiff's damages, it is not enough to consider what would have happened if the cause had not occurred—the law instructs us to look to a specific replacement for the cause, which in this case is the hypothetical scenario in which the defendant acted lawfully. And it is not enough to ask if the effect would still have occurred—the law requires us to look to a specific replacement for the effect, which in this case is the hypothetical outcome in which the plaintiff came off better. In place of “but for the defendant's breach, the plaintiff's damage would not have occurred,” I suggest the more explicit “if the defendant had acted lawfully, the plaintiff would have met a better fate.” An explicitly contrastive approach can thus potentially help the lawyer phrase her causal question in a more explicit way, while shedding light on our conception of causation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Legal Theory , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 259 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, David. (1999) “The Open Door: Counterfactual versus Singularist Theories of Causation.” In Sankey, Howard, ed., Causation and Laws of Nature, 175–185 (Kluwer Academic).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, Alex. (2009) “Fact and Law in the Causal Inquiry.” Legal Theory 15: 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, Carl. (2007) Explaining the Mind (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Fumerton, Richard, and Kress, Ken. (2001) “Causation and the Law: Preemption, Lawful Sufficiency, and Causal Sufficiency.” Law and Contemporary Problems 64: 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, W.M. (2008) “Structural Formulas and Explanation in Organic Chemistry.” Foundations of Chemistry 10: 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., and Honoré, Tony. (1985) Causation in the Law, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher Read. (1993) “A Generalized Probabilistic Theory of Causal Relevance.” Synthese 97: 335–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitchcock, Christopher Read. (1996) “The Role of Contrast in Causal and Explanatory Claims.” Synthese 107: 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, Tony. (2010) “Causation in the Law.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-law/.Google Scholar
Hume, David. (2007) (1740). “Abstract of A Treatise of Human Nature.” In Millican, Peter, ed., An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 133–145 (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lewis, David. (1986) “Causation.” In Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, 159–213 (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lipton, Peter. (1990) “Contrastive Explanation.” In Knowles, Dudley, ed., Explanation and Its Limits, 246–266 (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lipton, Peter. (1992) “Causation Outside the Law.” In Gross, Hyman and Harrison, Ross, eds., Jurisprudence: Cambridge Essays, 127–148 (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J.L. (1974) The Cement of the Universe (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Maslen, Cei. (2004) “Causes, Contrasts, and the Nontransitivity of Causation.” In Collins, John, Hall, Ned, and Paul, L.A., eds., Causation and Counterfactuals, 341–357 (MIT Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, Sarah. (2005) “Causation by Omission: A Dilemma.” Philosophical Studies 123: 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, D.H. (1995) The Facts of Causation (Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J.S. (1950) (1843) A System of Logic (Macmillan).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael. (2009) Causation and Responsibility (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northcott, Robert. (2008) “Causation and Contrast Classes.” Philosophical Studies 139: 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, L.A. (2000) “Aspect Causation.” Journal of Philosophy 97: 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, Judea. (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. (1992). “A Theory of Focus Interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. (2000) “Causation by Disconnection.” Philosophy of Science 67: 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. (2004) “Causes Need Not Be Physically Connected to Their Effects: The Case for Negative Causation.” In Hitchcock, Christopher Read, ed., Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science, 197–216 (Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. (2005) “Contrastive Causation.” Philosophical Review 114: 327–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. (2007) “The Metaphysics of Causation.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-metaphysics.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. (Forthcoming a) “Causal Contextualisms: Contrast, Default, and Model.” In Blaauw, Martijn, ed., Contrastivism in Philosophy (Routledge).Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. (Forthcoming b) “Disconnection and Responsibility.” Legal Theory.Google Scholar
Spirtes, Peter, Glymour, Clark, and Scheines, Richard. (1993) Causation Prediction and Search (Springer-Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, Jane. (2008) “Choosing What We Mean by ‘Causation’ in the Law.” Missouri Law Review 73: 433–480.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. (2008) “Some Reflections on Hart and Honoré.” In Kramer, Matthew H., Grant, Claire, Colburn, Ben, and Hatzistavrou, Anthony, eds., Causation in the Law. The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy, 143–164 (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas. (1980) The Scientific Image (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, James. (2003) Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wright, Richard. (1985) “Causation in Tort Law.” California Law Review 73: 1737–1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Richard. (2001) “Once More into the Bramble Bush: Duty, Causal Contribution, and the Extent of Legal Responsibility.” Vanderbilt Law Review 54: 1071–1132.Google Scholar