Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:08:58.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FORCING FREEDOM - Arthur Ripstein. Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009. Pp. 399, xiii.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Stephen Darwall*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Yale [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. One notable exception is Ernst Weinrib, The Idea of Private Law (1995).

2. Kant, Immanuel, Metaphysical Principles of the Doctrine of Right, in Practical Philosophy (Gregor, Mary ed., 1996)Google Scholar. References are to volume and page numbers from the Preussische Akademie edition of Kant's collected works.

3. Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974), at 148–154.

4. Compare this with the view developed in Darwall, Stephen, Bipolar Obligation, 5 Oxford Stud. Metaethics 7 (2012)Google Scholar.

5. Raz, Joseph, Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers, II, 47 Proc. Aristotelian Soc'y 79102 (1972); Joseph Raz, Practical Reason and Norms (2002)Google Scholar, at 98–104. See also MacCormick, Neal, “Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers, I,” 47 Proc. Aristotelian Soc'y 5978 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6. Here I draw on Darwall, Stephen, Demystifying Promises, in Promises and Agreements: Philosophical Essays (Sheinman, Hanoch ed., 2011)Google Scholar, at 255–276.

7. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (rev. ed. 1999), at 171–176.