No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
1 Brownsword, R Rights, Regulation and the Technological Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) (RRTR) p 316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Ibid, p 180.
3 Kirby, M Reform of the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983) pp 238–239 Google ScholarPubMed.
4 After Eco, U Six Walks in the Fictional Woods (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994)Google Scholar.
5 Lessig, Citing ‘The zones of cyberspace’ (1996) 48 Stanford Law Review 1403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 1408.
6 Reason and Morality (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978 Google ScholarPubMed) and ) exhaustively discussed and applied in ), esp chs 4 and 7.
7 New York: Basic Books, 1999 and ‘The law of the horse: what cyberlaw might teach’ (1999) 113 Harvard Law Review 501.
8 Reappraisals: Reflections on the Forgotten Twentieth Century (London: Heinemann, 2008 Google Scholar) ch 1.
9 Ibid, p 9.
10 Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Indianapolis, Irvington Pub, 1962 Google Scholar).
11 That the administration of law should be congruent with the rules as promulgated; Fuller, L The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969 Google Scholar) esp pp 209–210.
12 [2001] EWCA Civ 29, [2002] QB 628; [2003] UKHL 13, [2003] 2 AC 687.
13 [2003] EWCA Civ 667, [2003] 3 All ER 257; [2005] UKHL 28, [2005] 2 AC 561.
14 ‘Thou shalt not oppress a stranger: on the judicial protection of the human rights of non-EC nationals – a critique’ (1992) 3 EJIL 65 at 65.
15 Ibid.
16 At 65–66.
17 Hunt, A Governing Morals: A Social History of Moral Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999 Google Scholar).
18 Ibid, p 69.
19 Ibid, p 69.
20 Ibid, p 69. Dworkin, R Justice in Robes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006 Google Scholar).
21 [2002] EWCA Civ 1275, [2002] 1 WLR 3223. See also S v United Kingdom (2009) EHRR 50.
22 [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 1 WLR 2196.
23 [2002] EWCA Civ 1275 at [17]; emphasis added.
24 South Korea, Bioethics and BioSafety Act 2004.
25 Italy illustrates some of the tensions in recent reform of an unregulated jurisdiction to a tightly regulated one; see Law on medically assisted reproduction, 14 February 2004, n 40 (Gazzetta Ufficiale 24 February 2004, n 45).
26 EU Directive on Tissues and Cells, [2004] OJ L102/48.
27 US President's Council on Bioethics report Reproduction and Responsibility: The Regulation of New Biotechnologies (Washington, 2004); Chaired by Leon Kass.
28 Op cit, at 5.
29 Ibid; emphasis added.
30 Participating in discussion, members of a group tend to advocate riskier courses of action than individuals who did not participate in any such discussion. The classic introductory study remains that of Moscovici, S and Zavalloni, M ’The group as a polarizer of attitudes’ (1969) 12 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. I first learned of this phenomenon from the lectures of Jack Dowie at the University of Kent in 1974–1975; whether, and if so in what ways and to what extent and effect, this analysis might be applied to international treaty negotiations remains, for me at least, presently unknown. But for an exhaustive articulation of the limits and (limited) possibilities of (successfully) negotiating international treaties in a related field, see S Bartlett Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty-Making (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003) esp pp 49–85, 292–307, 355–359 and L Susskind Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004) passim and esp pp 73–78 on the importance of ‘epistemic communities’ in the negotiations processes. I suspect that there may be important generic read-overs available here into the world of technology regulation.
31 Ethical Principles in European Regulation of Biotechnology: Possibilities and Pitfalls (Copenhagen: Biotek, 2002) p 22 Google Scholar.
32 Silver, L Remaking Eden: Cloning, Genetic Engineering and the Future of Humankind? (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1998) pp 114–115 Google Scholar.
33 Ibid, p 144.
34 London: Profile, 2002, pp 190–91.
35 Ibid, p 187.
36 Ibid, p 190.
37 Redesigning Humans (London: Profile Books, 2002).
38 This summary is Brownsword's in his discussion of ‘regulatory phasing’ (p 19).
39 Beck, U Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk (Cambridge: Polity, 1992 p 203 Google Scholar, cited in J Black ‘Regulation as facilitation’ (1998) 61 MLR 621.
40 Kirby, above n 3, pp 238–239.
41 House of Lords Papers, Select Committee on Science & Technology, Third Report, Science and Society 2000, p 1.
42 Science and Technology Diplomacy; Concepts and Elements of a Work Programme (New York: United Nations, 2003) p 3 Google Scholar.
43 The extent to which companies invest capital offshore and establish wholly or jointly owned subsidiary companies overseas rather than just sourcing goods via systems of international trade; see RE Caves ‘The multinational enterprise as an economic organisation’ in RE Caves Multinational Enterprises and Economic Growth (1982), reprinted in Friedan, JA and Lake, DA (eds) International Political Economy: Perspectives on Global Power and Wealth (New York: Bedford/St Martins, 3rd edn, 1997) pp 139–153 Google Scholar.
44 Dunning, JH Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy (Essex: Addison Wesley, 1993) pp 79–80 Google Scholar.
45 For example, Ochame, K The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy (Pensacola: Ballinger, 1990 Google Scholar); also ).
46 For example, Strange, S States and Markets (London: Continuum, 1988 Google Scholar), ; R Roscrance ‘The rise of the virtual state’ (1996) July/August, Foreign Affairs.
47 Bobbitt, P The Shield of Achilles (London: Penguin, 2002 Google Scholar).
48 See, eg p 230 for his analysis of the current position and pp 735–736 for a vision of the future.
49 The text of the speech is available at http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org.
50 ‘Law and the demoralisation of medicine’ (2006) 26 LS 185.
51 Williams, R Lost Icons (London: T & T Clark, 2000 Google Scholar) esp ch 1.
52 Schwartz, B The Paradox of Choice (London: HarperCollins, 2005 Google Scholar).
53 Ten Have, H Images of man in the philosophy of medicine and bioethics’ in Evans, M and Sweeny, K (eds) The Human Side of Medicine (London: Royal College of Physicians, 1998) p 203 Google Scholar.
54 Hobsbawm, E Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914–1991 (London: Michael Joseph, 1994) p 287 Google Scholar.
55 Jonas, H The Imperative of Responsibility (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984 Google Scholar) p ix.
56 Ibid.
57 Ibid.
58 Ibid.
59 Ibid.
60 Drahos, P ‘The rights to food, health and intellectual property in the era of the “biogopolies”’ in Bottomley, S and Kinley, D (eds) Commercial Law and Human Rights (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001) p 215 Google Scholar at p 228.
61 Taken from the title of a roundtable in Geneva in 1999, International Roundtable in ‘Responses to Globalisation: Rethinking Equity in Health (Geneva, 1999).
62 Jonas, above n 54 esp pp 25–50.