No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
17. C. Bradley, The Rehnquist Legacy (2006), Introduction, p. 2.
18. Citing Thomas W. Merrill’s article, ‘The Making of the Second Rehnquist Court: A Preliminary Analysis’, (2003) 47 St. Louis L.J. 569. Merrill details two Rehnquist courts. Greenhouse adds a third.
19. In particular on criminal procedure. C. Bradley The Rehnquist Legacy, Introduction, p. 3; also C. Bradley, William Hubbs Rehnquist, in The Supreme Court Justices: A Bibliographical Dictionary 376 (M. Urofsky ed., 1994).
20. Apart from the one suggested in the title.
21. The Rehnquist Legacy (2006), p. 154.
22. Federal habeas corpus provides state prisoners the opportunity to challenge the constitutionality of their criminal convictions in federal court.
23. In 1996 Congress passed the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act – the first full-scale revision of the 1867 federal habeas corpus act.
24. C. Bradley, The Rehnquist Legacy, Introduction, p. 6, citing C. R. Sunstein, The Rehnquist Revolution, New Republic, December 27, 2004, 32.
25. For example, Stone, Chapter 1; Tomkovicz, Chapter 7.
26. 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
27. This includes the 1992 decision of Casey (Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey 505 U.S. 833 (1992)).
28. A traditionalist/original intent/intentionalism interpretation.
29. This is equally true of Lawrence v. Texas 539 U.S. 558 (2003), 156 L. Ed. 2d 508. This case is mentioned in several places, most notably in Chapter 16.
30. C. Bradley The Rehnquist Legacy, Introduction, p. 6.