Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:30:00.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Idea of Private Law by Ernest Weinrib. Cambridge Mass; London: Harvard University Press, 1995, x + 237 pp (hardback), £22.95

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Joanna Perkins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 204 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See also Weinrib, ‘Why Legal Formalism’ in George, (ed) Naturul Law Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992) pp 352–3;Google Scholar Weinrib ‘Aristotle's Forms of Justice’2 Ratio Juris 211, p 221; Weinrib, ‘The Intelligibility of the Rule of Law’ in Hutchinson, and Monahan, (eds) The Rule oflaw: Ideal or Ideology (Toronto: Carswell, 1987) p 64;Google Scholar Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 958.

2 Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 959.

3 Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 974.

4 Weinrib ‘understanding Tort Law’ 77 Valparaiso University Law Review 485, p 494.

5 Also Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 978; Weinrib ‘corrective Justice’ 77 Iowa Law Review 403, p 419; Weinrib, ‘Why Legal Formalism’ in George, (ed) Natural Law Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), p 357.Google Scholar

6 Weinrib ‘Aristotle's Forms of Justice’2 Ratio Juris 211, p 219.

7 Weinrib, ‘The Intelligibility of the Rule of Law’ in Hutchinson, and Monahan, (eds), The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology (Toronto: Carswell, 1987), p 71f.Google Scholar

8 Weinrib, ‘Why Legal Formalism’ in George, (ed) Natural Law Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992), p 357.Google Scholar

9 Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 974.

10 See Weinrib ‘Corrective Justice’77 Iowa Law Review 403; Weinrib ‘Understanding Tort Law’ 77 Valparaiso Universify Law Review 485; Weinrib, ‘The Intelligibility of the Rule of Law’ in Hutchinson, and Monahan, (eds), The Rule of law: Ideal or Ideology (Toronto: Carswell, 1987).Google Scholar

11 Weinrib, ‘The Intelligibility of the Rule of Law’ in Hutchinson, and Monahan, (eds), The Rule of law: Ideal or Ideology (Toronto: Carswell, 1987) p 71.Google Scholar

12 Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 974.

13 Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993) p 173.Google Scholar

14 See Broad The Mind and its Place in Nature (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1951) p 488f.

15 See Frankena, ‘The Naturalistic Fallacy’ in Foot (ed) Theories of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1967) p 52.Google Scholar

16 See Brencher, ‘formalism, Positivism, and Natural Law in Ernest Weinrib's Tort Theory: Will the Real Ernest Weinrib Please Come Forward’ University of Toronto Law Journnl 318, p 338.Google Scholar

17 Kelman, A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Cambridge Mass; London: Harvard University Press, 1987) p 245.Google Scholar

18 Kelman, A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Cambridge Mass; London: Harvard University Press, 1987) p 258.Google Scholar

19 See Finnis, ‘On “The Critical Legal Studies Movements”’ in Eekelaar, and Bell, (eds) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence 3rd Series (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar