Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
The general theme of this lecture was prompted by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the second woman in the United States Supreme Court. To celebrate my appointment she sent me a fascinating book, Supreme Court Decisions and the Rights of Women. This set me thinking about what a similar book on House of Lords Decisions and the Rights of Women might have to say. My first thought was ‘not a lot, surely’. The two courts are very different. The Supreme Court is a constitutional court under a constitution which guarantees the equal protection of the laws. The appellate committee of the House of Lords is not a constitutional court, although the Human Rights Act 1998 has made it look a little more like one. The judicial committee of the Privy Council, however, has in practice the same composition as the House of Lords.
1. Washington: CQ Press, 2001.
2. (1873) 16 Wall 130.
3. (1875) 21 Wall 162.
4. (1873) 83 US 36.
5. (1875) 21 Wall 162.
6. (1996) 518 US 515.
7. [1909] AC 147.
8. See Jex-Blake v Senatus of the University of Edinburgh (1873) 11 M 784.
9. 9 & 8 Geo 5, c 64.
10. 8 & 9 Geo 5, c 47.
11. [1922] 2 AC 339.
12. See the Wensleydale Peerage Case (1856) 5 HLC 958.
13. At p 396.
14. [1914] 1 Ch 286.
15. [1930] AC 124.
16 (1868) LR 4 CP 374.
17. (1889) 23 QB 79.
18. (1946) 329 US 187.
19. 368 US 57.
20. (1975) 419 US 522.
21. 6 April 1992.
22. (1999] 2 AC 629.
23. [2004) 1 WLR 201.
24. [2002] 2 AC 357.
25. Para 46.
26. Para 40.
27. (1994) 511 US 127.
28. (1946) 329 US 187.
29. [1998] AC 147 at 158, [1997) 4 All ER 225 at 233.
30. [1999] 4 All ER 705 at 726.
31. [1981] AC 800 at 822, [1981) 1 All ER 545 at 565.