Article contents
The House of Lords and women's rights or Am I really a Law Lord?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Extract
The general theme of this lecture was prompted by Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the second woman in the United States Supreme Court. To celebrate my appointment she sent me a fascinating book, Supreme Court Decisions and the Rights of Women. This set me thinking about what a similar book on House of Lords Decisions and the Rights of Women might have to say. My first thought was ‘not a lot, surely’. The two courts are very different. The Supreme Court is a constitutional court under a constitution which guarantees the equal protection of the laws. The appellate committee of the House of Lords is not a constitutional court, although the Human Rights Act 1998 has made it look a little more like one. The judicial committee of the Privy Council, however, has in practice the same composition as the House of Lords.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2005
References
1. Washington: CQ Press, 2001.
2. (1873) 16 Wall 130.
3. (1875) 21 Wall 162.
4. (1873) 83 US 36.
5. (1875) 21 Wall 162.
6. (1996) 518 US 515.
7. [1909] AC 147.
8. See Jex-Blake v Senatus of the University of Edinburgh (1873) 11 M 784.
9. 9 & 8 Geo 5, c 64.
10. 8 & 9 Geo 5, c 47.
11. [1922] 2 AC 339.
12. See the Wensleydale Peerage Case (1856) 5 HLC 958.
13. At p 396.
14. [1914] 1 Ch 286.
15. [1930] AC 124.
16 (1868) LR 4 CP 374.
17. (1889) 23 QB 79.
18. (1946) 329 US 187.
19. 368 US 57.
20. (1975) 419 US 522.
21. 6 April 1992.
22. (1999] 2 AC 629.
23. [2004) 1 WLR 201.
24. [2002] 2 AC 357.
25. Para 46.
26. Para 40.
27. (1994) 511 US 127.
28. (1946) 329 US 187.
29. [1998] AC 147 at 158, [1997) 4 All ER 225 at 233.
30. [1999] 4 All ER 705 at 726.
31. [1981] AC 800 at 822, [1981) 1 All ER 545 at 565.
- 1
- Cited by