Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T01:20:41.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exercising discretion in the context of dependent employment: assessing the impact of workload on the rule of law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Shelagh MR Campbell
Shelagh MR Campbell*
Affiliation:
University of Regina
*
Shelagh MR Campbell, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Faced with growing pressures for accountability and increasing complexity of legal work, the international legal community has focused attention on support for the rule of law. Taking a workplace perspective, this study develops and tests an individual-level measure of support for the rule of law in the context of the Canadian public sector. Results from a national survey of government-employed lawyers reveal that increasing work demands have a detrimental effect on perceived ability to uphold the rule of law in the daily execution of work tasks. This negative pressure is moderated by social support in the workplace, with diminishing effect. Lawyers in criminal law practice appear more negatively affected by work demands than those in civil or common law practices.

Type
Research Article
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 305 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research funding for this project came from Le Centre interuniversitaire sur la mondialization et le travail (CRIMT) and travel funding was provided by the Canadian Association of Crown Counsel. Dr Marie Josée Legault provided research support for the development, and assistance with the translation, of the survey instrument. I thank Dr Adrian Pitariu for assistance with Hayes' process test for moderation, and Kaila Bruer for research assistance.

References

1. Canadian Association of Crown Counsel Comment on Quebec Prosecutors' Strike (2011), available at http://www.cacc-acje.ca/en/index.php/front (accessed 25 April 2012); A Chung ‘Quebec forces prosecutors back to work’ (2011) Toronto Star electronic, available at http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/942795--quebec-forces-prosecutors-back-to-work (accessed 16 June 2016).

2. Campbell, S Continental Drift in the Legal Profession: The Struggle for Collective Bargaining by Nova Scotia's Crown Prosecutors (Halifax, NS: Saint Mary's University, 2010)Google Scholar.

3. Rhode, DL In the Interests of Justice: Reforming the Legal Profession (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

4. de Lange, AH et al ‘The very best of the millennium: longitudinal research and the Demand–Control–(Support) model’ (2003) 8 J Occup Health Psychol 282–305 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

5. Campbell, above n 2; Campbell, S and Haiven, L ‘Struggles on the frontier of professional control: leading cases from Canada’ (2012) 33 Econ & Ind Democracy 669–689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Campbell, S et al ‘The impact of occupational community on the quality of internal control’ (2015) J Bus Ethics DOI:10.1007/s10551-015-2624-2Google Scholar; Ackroyd, S and Muzio, D ‘The reconstructed professional firm: explaining change in English legal practices’ (2007) 28 Org Stud 729–747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Muzio, D and Ackroyd, S ‘Change in the legal profession: professional agency and the legal labour process’ in Ackroyd, S, Muzio, D and Chalat, J-F Redirections in the Study of Expert Labour: Established Professions and New Expert Occupations (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6. Dodek, A ‘Lawyering at the intersection of public law and legal ethics: government lawyers as custodians of the rule of law’ (2010) 33 Dalhousie L J 1–53 Google Scholar.

7. Ibid.

8. The University of Ottawa, in the nation's capital, McGill University in Montreal and l'Université de Sherbrooke offer the opportunity to complete degrees in both legal systems; Osgoode Law School in Toronto partners with l'Université de Montréal to provide students in each school the option of additional course work to qualify in both systems; the University of Windsor partners with a US law school or an American law degree.

9. For the purposes of this study, notaries in the province of Quebec are included within the civil-side group.

10. A Dodek ‘Lawyers, guns and money: lawyers and power in Canadian society’ (2010), available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1656475 or 10.2139/ssrn.1656475 (both accessed 16 June 2016).

11. Gomme, I and Hall, M (1995) ‘Prosecutors at work: role overload and strain’ (1995) 23 J Crim Just 191–200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hamilton, J. ‘Prosecutorial independence and accountability’ (2011) UNIDEM Campus Trieste Seminar, Trieste, Italy Google Scholar.

12. Chung, above n 1.

13. G Hannon, General Counsel, Manitoba Justice, personal communication (2012).

14. Registered Nurses Association of Ontario Workplace Health, Safety, and Well-Being of the Nurse, Healthy Work Environments Best Practice Guidelines (Toronto: Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, 2008)Google Scholar.

15. Lipsky, M Street Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of Individuals in Public Service (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1980)Google Scholar.

16. Larkin, G Occupational Monopoly and Modern Medicine (London: Tavistock, 1983)Google Scholar; Freidson, E Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986)Google Scholar; Parkin, F Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; Witz, A Professions and Patriarchy (London: Routledge, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Karasek, R ‘Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign’ (1979) 24 Admin Sci Q 2285–2308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also: de Lange et al, above n 4; de Jonge, J and Schaufeli, W ‘Job characteristics and employee well-being: a test of Warr's Vitamin Model in health care workers using structural equation modelling’ (2008) 19 J Org Behav 387–407 Google Scholar; Holman, D and Wall, T ‘Work characteristics, learning-related outcomes, and strain: a test of competing direct effects, mediated, and moderated models’ (2002) 7 J Occup Health Psychol 283–301 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Beehr, T et al ‘Back to basics: re-examination of Demand–Control theory of occupational stress’ (2001) 15 Work & Stress 115–130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. Karasek, above n 17; Verhoeven, C et al ‘The job Demand–Control–Social Support model and wellness/health outcomes: a European study’ (2003) 18 Psychol & Health 421–440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19. Freidson, above n 16.

20. Abbott, A The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Witz, above n 16.

21. Campbell, S ‘Erosion and renewal of professional powers in public sector employment: the role of occupational community’ (2014) 69 Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 159–185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Muzio, D and Hodgson, D Towards Organisational Professionalism: New Patterns of Professionalisation in UK Expert Labour International Labour Process Conference, Dublin, Ireland (2008)Google Scholar.

22. Bucher, R and Strauss, A ‘Professions in process’ (1961) 66 Am J Sociol 325–334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23. Pomaki, G and Anagnostopoulou, T ‘A test and extension of the demand/control/social support model: prediction of wellness/health outcomes in Greek teachers’ (2003) 18(4) Psychol & Health 537–550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24. Muzio, D et al ‘Towards corporate professionalization: the case of project management, management consultancy and executive search’ (2011) 59 Current Sociol 443–464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25. Campbell and Haiven, above n 5; Rhode, above n 3; Manrique, R ‘Autonomy and the rule of law’ (2007) 20 Ratio Juris 280–301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cartier, G ‘Administrative discretion as dialogue: a response to John Willis’ (2005) 55 U Toronto L J 629–656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rosenberg, M ‘The Attorney General and the prosecution function on the twenty-first century’ (2009) 2 Queen's L J 813–862 Google Scholar; Sossin, L ‘From neutrality to compassion: the place of civil service values and legal norms in the exercise of administrative discretion’ (2005) 55 U Toronto L J 427–447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26. Hickman, T, Poitras, L and Evans, G The Report of the Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr., Prosecution (Halifax, NS: Nova Scotia Department of Justice, 1989)Google Scholar.

27. Dodek, above nn 7, 11.

28. Krause, E Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

29. Campbell, above n 2.

30. Lipskey, above 15.

31. Gershowitz, A and Killinger, L ‘The state (never) rests: how excessive prosecutor caseloads harm criminal defendants’ (2011) 105 Nw U L Rev Google Scholar, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1583462 (accessed 16 June 2016).

32. Nova Scotia Department of Justice Legal Services 2011), available at http://www.gov.ns.ca/just/legal_services/ (accessed 10 December 2011).

33. Gomme and Hall, above n 11.

34. Sossin, above n 25; Evans, T and Harris, J ‘Street-level bureaucracy, social work, and the (exaggerated) death of discretion’ (2004) 34 Br J Soc Work 871–895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sossin, L ‘Discretion unbound: reconciling the Charter and soft law’ (2002) 45 Can Pub Admin 465–490 Google Scholar.

35. Karasek, R and Theorell, T Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life (New York: Basic Books, 1990)Google Scholar.

36. Karasek, above n 17.

37. Karasek and Thorell, above n 35; Johnson, J ‘Control, collectivity and the psychosocial work environment’ in Sauter, S, Hurrrell, J and Hall, E (eds) Job Control and Worker Health (Chichester: Wiley, 1989) 55–74 Google Scholar.

38. See de Lange et al, above n 17 for a review.

39. De Jonge and Schaufeli, above n 17; Verhoeven et al, above n 18.

40. Kowalski-Trakofler, K, Vaught, C and Scharf, T ‘Judgment and decision making under stress: an overview for emergency managers’ (2003) 1 Int'l J Emergency Mgmt 278–289 at 282Google Scholar.

41. Dandurand, Y ‘The role of prosecutors in promoting and strengthening the rule of law’ (2007) 47 Crime L & Soc Change 247–259 Google Scholar.

42. Dodek, above n 10.

43. Bingham, T The Rule of Law (London: Penguin, 2010)Google Scholar; Hogg, P and Zwibel, C ‘The rule of law in the Supreme Court of Canada’ (2005) 55 U Toronto L J 715–732 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44. S Voight ‘How to measure the rule of law’ (2009), available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1420287 (accessed 16 June 2016); P Albers How To Measure the Rule of Law: A Comparison of Three Studies Presentation at annual conference of Hague Institute for the Internationalisation of Law ‘The Law of the Future’ (25–27 October 2007), available at http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/events/OnEnParle/Albers251007.pdf (accessed 16 June 2016); J Parsons et al Developing Indicators to Measure the Rule of Law: A Global Approach, A Report to the World Justice Project (Altus Global Alliance/Vera Institute of Justice, 2008), available at http://www.altus.org/pdf/dimrol_en.pdf (accessed 16 June 2016).

45. Skaaning, S ‘Measuring the rule of law’ (2012) 63 Pol Res Q 449–460 Google Scholar.

46. Nugent-Borakove, M, Budzilowicz, L and Rainville, G Performance Measures for Prosecutors: Findings from the Application of Performance Measures in Two Prosecutors' Offices (Alexandria, VA: American Prosecutors Research Institute, 2007)Google Scholar, available at http://www.ndaa.org/pdf/performance_measures_findings_07.pdf (accessed 16 June 2016).

47. Griffin, L ‘The prudent prosecutor’ (2001) 14 Geo J Legal Ethics 259–307 Google Scholar.

48. Hamilton, J ‘Prosecutorial independence and accountability’ (2011) UNIDEM Campus Trieste Seminar, Trieste, Italy Google Scholar.

49. Campbell, above n 21.

50. Karasek, R Job Content Instrument: Questionnaire and Users' Guide Revision 1.1 (Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California, 1985)Google Scholar.

51. Ibid.

52. Ibid.

53. Institut de la statistique du Québec Study on the Compensation and Workload of Crown Prosecutors in Canada (Quebec: Government of Quebec, 2002)Google Scholar.

54. Taris, TW et al ‘Learning new behaviour patterns: a longitudinal test of Karasek's active learning hypothesis among Dutch teachers’ (2003) 17(1) Work & Stress 1–20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55. McCracken recommends eight interviews [ McCraken, G The Long Interview (Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, 1988 CrossRefGoogle Scholar] and Lincoln and Guba [ Lincoln, Y and Guba, E Naturalistic Inquiry (Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, 1985) p 234 Google Scholar] suggest that a sample of a dozen interviews ‘will exhaust most available information’. I contacted participants as they became available to me, or as they were recommended by existing study participants. I continued until I reached a saturation point and no new themes, concepts or issues emerged.

56. Campbell, above 2.

57. National data on marital status for 2012 reveals that rates of divorce and separation in the sample are consistent with national averages. A greater proportion of the national population (40.5%) report being single for this same period, a fact that may be explained by age and socio-economic difference in the sample compared to the Canadian population in general. Statistics Canada, CANSIM, table 051-0042, available at http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/i01/cst01/famil01-eng.htm (accessed 16 June 2016).

58. These statistics correspond to national data reported by the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, which show that women make up 53% of practicing members exempted from insurance – a group comprised of public-sector employed lawyers and in-house counsel. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, ‘Membership (2014 statistical report)’, available at http://docs.flsc.ca/2014-Statistics.pdf (accessed 27 September 2016).\

59. Kessler, R et al Short Screening Scales to Monitor Population Prevalences and Trends in Non-specific Psychological Distress (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google ScholarPubMed.

60. A summary of this analysis is not included, for brevity, but is available upon request.

61. The Keyser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.842, indicating that the data are suitable for this type of analysis. In addition, Barlett's test of sphericity was significant (p < 0.001), indicating sufficient correlation between the items to proceed with analysis. Using a retention criterion of eigenvalues greater than one, a single-factor solution presents the clearest extraction, accounting for 55% of the total variance.

62. Karasek, above n 50.

63. At the federal level and in some provinces, prosecution services do not fall under the Attorney General, but under a Director of Public Prosecutions, accountable to the Legislature.

64. F(1,1338) = 81.47, p < 0.001, R 2 adj = 0.06).

65. Hayes, A Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis (New York: The Guilford Press, 2013)Google Scholar.

66. F(3,1305) = 54.2, p < 0.001 R 2 = 0.11.

67. F(5,1303) = 36.4371, p < 0.001 R 2 = 0.35, interaction coefficient = 0.1017, p = 0.0085).

68. Boswell, W, Olson-Buchanan, J and LePine, M ‘Relations between stress and work outcomes: The role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain’ (2004) 64 J Vocat Behav 165–181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69. De Jong and Schaufeli, above n 17; Warr, P ‘Decision latitude, job demands, and employee well-being’ (1990) 4 Work & Stress 285–294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70. Health Services and Support – Facilities Subsector Bargaining Association v British Columbia, 2007 Supreme Court of Canada, 27 SCR.

71. Campbell and Haiven, above n 5.

72. Campbell, above n 2.

73. Dodek, above n 6.

74. Gershowitz and Killinger, above n 31.