Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:40:06.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EU Environmental Law: Challenges, Change and Decision-Making by Maria Lee, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005, xxxix, + 270 + (index) 5 pp (£25.00 paperback). ISBN 1-84113-410-4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Compare, for instance, the juxtaposition of economic and intrinsic valuation methods by N Hanley ‘The Economic Value of Environmental Damage’ and M Bowman ‘Biodiversity, Intrinsic Value, and the Definition and Valuation of Environmental Harm’ in M Bowman and A Boyle (eds) Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law: Problems of Definition and Valuation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).

2. See further H E Daly and J B Cobb For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environmentanda Sustainable Future (Boston, Mass: Beacon Press, 1989), cf M Faure and G Skogh The Economic Analysis ofEnvironmenta1 Policy and Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2003); G Heal ‘Markets and Sustainability’ in R L Revesz, P Sands and R B Stewart (eds) Environmental Law, the Economy, and Sustainable Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

3. See N de Sadeleer Environmental Principles: from Political Slogans to Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

4. D A Farber Eco-pragmatism: Making Sensible Environmental Decisions in an Uncertain World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).

5. M Lee and C Abbot ‘The Usual Suspects? Public Participation under the Aarhus Convention’ (2003) 61 MLR 80; J Steele ‘Participation and Deliberation in Environmental Law - Exploring a Problem-Solving Approach’ (2001) 21 OJLS 415; R Macrory ‘European Citizenship and the Law: Repairing the European Road’ (1996) 8 JEL 219.

6. R Macrory ‘Regulating in a Risky Environment’ [2001] CLP 619.

7. T Smith ‘Regulatory Reform in the USA and Europe’ (1996) 8 JEL 257.

8. S Barrett Environment & Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty Making (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

9. Titanium Dioxide, Commission v Council [1991] ECR 2827.

10. For instance, M Jacobs ‘Sustainable Development as a Contested Concept’ in A Dobson (ed) Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).

11. See further A Ross ‘Is the Environment Getting Squeezed Out of Sustainable Development?’ [2003] PL 249.

12. J Holder Environmental Assessment - The Regulation of Decision Making (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), especially pp 86-89.

13. See R B Stewart ‘A New Generation of Environmental Regulation?’ (2001) 29 Capital ULR 21 ; N Gunningham, P Grabosky and D Sinclair Sml? Regularion: Designing Environmental Policy (Oxford: Clarendon, 1998) pp 41-47; C R Sunstein ‘Paradoxes of the Regulatory State’ (1990) 57 U Chi LR 407.

14. Echoes of M Sagoff The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy Law and Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

15. See D Adam ‘Global Companies Snub Survey on Climate Change’ Guardian, 15 September 2005.

16. See R C Paehlke Democracy’s Dilemma - Environment, Social Equity and the Global Economy (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2003).