Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:08:16.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collective memory in law and policy: the problem of the sovereign debt crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Patrick O'Callaghan
Patrick O'Callaghan*
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The idea of ‘collective memory’ features prominently in several disciplines but rarely in legal scholarship. Drawing on the work of Henri Bergson, Maurice Halbwachs and GWF Hegel, this paper seeks to present an account of collective memory that is relevant to discourse on law and policy. The paper uses the example of the policy response to the European sovereign debt crisis as a means of illustrating how collective memory of events in the distant past can shape individual behaviour and thinking. It argues that the current policy response can be explained, at least in part, by the influence on policy makers of the standard historical narrative of the Great Inflation of Weimar Germany. When, however, collective memory takes the form of Bergsonian ‘habit memory’, it can inhibit our efforts to resolve hard cases and the German government's opposition to the European Central Bank acting as a lender of last resort in the government bond markets neatly illustrates this point. If the debt crisis is to be managed effectively, policy makers must draw on Bergsonian ‘pure memory’ to explore the bounds of political and economic possibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 642 - 660
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. ‘Struckturwandel’ is a common term in the German sociological and economic literature and translates as ‘structural transformation’. It denotes fundamental political, social or economic change. See, eg, Jürgen Habermas' Habilitationsschrift: Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft (Berlin: Luchterhand, 1962).

2. For evidence of the full extent of the influence across these disciplines, see Olick, JK and Robbins, J ‘Social memory studies: from “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices’ (1998) 24 Annual Review of Sociology 105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In law, important contributions include Osiel, M Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory and the Law (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1997)Google Scholar and Savelsberg, JJ and Ryan, D American Memories: Atrocities and the Law (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. See, eg, Schwartz, B ‘Culture and collective memory’ in Hall, JR, Grindstaff, L and Lo, MC (eds) Handbook of Cultural Sociology (London: Routledge, 2010) p 620 Google Scholar.

4. On this point, see Nuzzo, A ‘Phenomenology, history and the question of memory’ in Pires, EB (ed) Still Reading Hegel: 200 Years after the Phenomenology of Spirit (Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, 2009), p 10 Google Scholar.

5. Rawls, J The Laws of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

6. On the financial crisis of 2007–2010, see Krugman, P The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008 (London: Allen Lane, 2008)Google Scholar; Stiglitz, J Freefall: Free Markets and the Sinking of the Global Economy (London: Allen Lane, 2010)Google Scholar; Roubini, N Crisis Economics: A Crash Course in the Future of Finance (New York: Penguin, 2011)Google Scholar.

7. Acharya, V, Philippon, T, Richardson, M and Roubini, N ‘the financial crisis of 2007–2009: causes and remedies’ (2009) 18 Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. Reinhart and Rogoff have recently published a historical database that surveys over two centuries of debt and banking crises. They find that banking crises help predict sovereign debt crises in that they usually precede them or coincide with them. This finding may support the thesis that banking debt remains a contingent liability for governments. See Reinhart, CM and Rogoff, KS ‘from financial crash to debt crisis’ (2011) 101 American Economics Review 1676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 1689.

9. See Featherstone, K ‘the Greek sovereign debt crisis and Emu: a failing state in a skewed regime’ (2011) 49 Journal of Common Market Studies 193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. See Gray, J and O'Callaghan, P ‘Legal perspectives on tensions at the heart of the project’ in The Macroeconomic and Financial Landscape in the Aftermath of the 2007 Crisis: New Challenges and Perspectives (Florence: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, 2011) pp 27–35 Google Scholar.

11. Ibid.

12. The chief economist at the IMF, Oliver Blanchard, talks of the ‘wide perception that policy-makers are one step behind the action’. T Ahmann ‘Europe must get its act together – IMF official’Reuters 20 September 2011, available at http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/09/20/uk-imf-europe-actions-idUKTRE78J2Z320110920

13. Article 3 of the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union, available at http://www.european-council.europa.eu/media/579087/treaty.pdf

14. See Mundell, RA ‘a theory of optimum currency areas’ (1961) 51 American Economics Review 657 Google Scholar.

15. D Giannone, M Lenza and L Reichlin Business Cycles in the Euro Area, ECB Working Paper Series (No 1010/February 2009), available at http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1010.pdf

16. Willett, TD, Permpoon, O and Wihlborg, C ‘Endogenous Oca analysis and the early euro experience’ (2010) 33 World Economy 851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. The ‘Compact for Growth and Jobs’ agreed at the Euro Area Summit Meeting in June 2012 indicates a change of tone and perhaps a softening of the approach to the austerity measures.

18. See H Carnegy ‘Hollande at odds with key partners on structural reform’Financial Times 8 May 2012, available at http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/53f19eb6-990c-11e1-9da3-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1ynaM5c3t

19. Boyer, R ‘the four fallacies of contemporary austerity policies: the lost Keynesian legacy’ (2012) 36 Cambridge Journal of Economics 283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20. Ibid, at 300.

21. Ibid, at 283.

22. Ibid, at 290.

23. Ibid, at 302.

24. Ibid, at 301.

25. Ibid, at 300.

26. Ibid, at 306.

27. See Eucken, W The Foundations of Economics (London: William Hodge, 1950)Google Scholar; Dürr, EW Wesen und Ziele des Ordo-Liberalismus (Winterthur: Keller, 1954)Google Scholar; Böhm, F Reden und Schriften (Karlsruhe: CF Müller, 1960)Google Scholar.

28. Because ordo-liberal theory emphasises the importance of creating and maintaining a legal framework, it must be distinguished from what Campbell calls the ‘bald neo-liberal message’ that Richard Posner and others have promoted. For Campbell, this message is the ‘the laughable, had the joke not turned out to be not funny at all, belief in spontaneous optimisation by a deregulated market, when deregulation is conceived entirely negatively as the mere destruction of regulation’. Campbell, D ‘the end of Posnerian law and economics’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29. Eucken, above n 27, p 315.

30. Sally, R ‘Ordo-liberalism and the social market: classical political economy from Germany’ (1996) 1 New Political Economy 233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 234.

31. On ‘constitutional choice’, see VJ Vanberg ‘The Freiburg School: Walter Eucken and ordo-liberalism’ (2011) Freiburger Diskussionspapiere zur Ordnungsökonomik 04/11 at 5.

32. Eucken, W Wirtschaftsmacht und Wirtschaftsordnung (Münster: Lit Verlag, 2001) p 77 Google Scholar.

33. There are clear intellectual links between Hayek's work and ordo-liberal theory. On these points, see in particular, Vanberg, VJ ‘Friedrich a. Hayek und die Freiburger Schule’ (2003) 54 Ordo Yearbook of Economic and Social Order 1 Google Scholar.

34. Miksch, L ‘Die Verstaatlichung der Produktionsmittel in der Morphologie der Wirtschaftsordnungen’ in Weddige, W (ed) Untersuchungen zur sozialen Gestaltung der Wirtschaftsordnung (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1950) p 91 Google Scholar.

35. Eucken, above n 27, p 314.

36. Ibid, pp 314–315.

37. Ibid, p 314.

38. See generally, Nicholls, AJ Freedom with Responsibility: The Social Market Economy in Germany, 1918–1963 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

39. For Bakhtin, in each epoch or social group there are authoritative utterances that ‘set the tone’, on which ‘one relies, to which one refers, which are cited, imitated and followed’ and which, ultimately, shape our way of life and cultural practices. See Bakhtin, MM Speech Genres and Other Late Papers (Emerson, C & Holquist, M, eds, VW McGee, trans) (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1984) pp 88–89 Google Scholar.

40. Allen, CS ‘Ordo-liberalism trumps Keynesianism in the Federal Republic of Germany’ in Moss, B (ed) Monetary Union in Crisis: The European Union as a Neo-liberal Construction (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005) p 215 Google Scholar.

41. See Joerges, C ‘What is left of the European economic constitution? a melancholic eulogy’ (2005) European Law Review 461 Google Scholar. See also Colliat, R ‘a critical genealogy of European macroeconomic governance’ (2012) 18 European Law Journal 6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42. Joerges, above n 41, at 471.

43. Akman, P ‘Searching for the long-lost soul of Article 82 Ec’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44. Gerber, DJ ‘Constitutionalizing the economy: German neo-liberalism, competition law and the “new” Europe’ (1994) 42 Am Journal of Comparative Law 25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 47–48.

45. Louis, JV ‘Guest editorial: the no-bailout clause and rescue packages’ (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review 971 Google Scholar at 982.

46. BVerfGE 89, 155; Brunner v European Union Treaty [1994] 1 CMLR 57 at 101.

47. Ibid, at 90.

48. Joerges, above n 41, at 475.

49. See, eg, BVerfG, Urt v 7.9.2011 – 2 BvR 987/10, 2 BvR 1485/10, 2 BvR 1099/10 = NJW 2011, 2946 (Griechenland-Hilfe und Euro-Rettungsschirm).

50. On this account, ‘inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon’. Friedman, M Dollars and Deficits: Living with America's Economic Problems (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968) p 39 Google Scholar.

51. For Bakhtin, monologue ‘pretends to be the ultimate word. It closes down the represented world and represented persons.’ Bakhtin, M Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics (Emerson, C, ed and trans) (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1984) p 293 Google Scholar.

52. See, eg, Fischer, DH The Great Wave: Price Revolution and the Rhythm of History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

53. On the link between inflation and militarism, see von Mises, L Nation, State, and Economy: Contributions to the Politics and History of Our Time (Yeager, LB, trans) (New York: New York University Press, 1983) p 163 Google Scholar.

54. Gadamer calls this sort of thinking ‘naive’ arguing that: ‘True historical thinking must take account of its own historicality.’ By this he means that we must not try to ‘overcome’ temporal distance (at least for the purposes of hermeneutics). Distance in time is a ‘positive and productive possibility of understanding. It is not a yawning abyss, but is filled with the continuity of custom and tradition in the light of which all that is handed down presents itself to us.’ Gadamer, HG Truth and Method (London: Sheed & Ward, 1975) pp 264–265 Google Scholar. For Gadamer, temporal distance is therefore necessary in order to interpret a text and identify ‘true’ and ‘false’ prejudices. Mindful of Gadamer's warnings, the ‘questionable features’ that follow are mere conjectures in the sense of Popperian trial and error.

55. See generally, Feldman, GD The Great Disorder: Politics, Economics and Society in the German Inflation, 1914–1924 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar. See also Bessel, R Germany after the First World War (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)Google Scholar and Ferguson, N Paper and Iron: Hamburg Business and German Politics in the Era of Inflation, 1897–1927 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56. Guttmann, W and Meehan, P The Great Inflation (Farnborough: Saxon House, 1975) p 233 Google Scholar.

57. Feldman, above n 55, p 3.

58. Ibid, p 4.

59. Ibid.

60. Ibid.

61. Widdig, B Culture and Inflation in Weimar Germany (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001) p 5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62. Habermas, J ‘Yet again: German identity: a unified nation of angry Dm-Burghers’ (1991) 52 New German Critique 84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 86.

63. Foucault, M The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (Burchell, G, trans) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010) p 102 Google Scholar.

64. Ibid, p 86.

65. Ibid, p 84.

66. Feldman, above n 55, pp 855–856.

67. Ibid, p 857.

68. Barry, B Political Argument (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965)Google Scholar.

69. The Wirtschaftswunder (‘economic miracle’) was the period of rapid GDP growth and improvement in living standards in West Germany during the 1950s. On the period of postwar consensus, see Judt, T Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945 (London: Pimlico, 2007)Google Scholar, in particular, Chapters VIII–XI.

70. Feldman, above n 55, p 5.

71. Shiller, eg, demonstrates that on the whole, Germans are more concerned about inflation than Americans. See J Shiller Why Do People Dislike Inflation? Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper (No 1115, 1996). Rowley shows that the ‘threat’ of inflation was used in election campaigns in Germany until the 1980s. See Rowley, E Hyperinflation in Germany: Perceptions of a Process (Aldershot: Scholar Press, 1994) p 177 Google Scholar.

72. I am most grateful to Professor Schachtschneider for providing me with a copy of the arguments used before the German Constitutional Court on 7 May 2010.

73. A Cowell ‘Kohl casts Europe's economic union as war and peace issue’New York Times, 17 October 1995, available at http://www.nytimes.com/1995/10/17/world/kohl-casts-europe-s-economic-union-as-war-and-peace-issue.html?src=pm

74. Feldman advances a similar argument highlighting the ‘tendency [among popular historians and others] to confuse the trauma of hyperinflation [of Weimar] with the entire inflationary experience’. Feldman, above n 55, p 5.

75. Within this context we should also note that inflation has traditionally been one of the four basic mechanisms of reducing debt/GDP ratios. See further Aizenman, J and Marion, N ‘Using inflation to erode the Us public debt’ (2011) 33 Journal of Macroeconomics 524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76. Because Halbwachs does not pay close attention to features of individual cognitive function in his writings, many of those who have embraced the idea of collective memory assume that he deemed individual memory meaningless. Gedi and Elam, eg, inform us that for Halbwachs, ‘there is really no such thing as “individual memory”’. See Gedi, N and Elam, Y ‘Collective memory – what is it?’ (1996) 8 History and Memory 30 Google Scholar at 37. However, we should note here that Paul Connerton refers to Bergson in elaborating his own theory of ‘habit memory’ in bodily performances (or incorporated practices). See Connerton, P., How Societies Remember (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77. Kundera, M Ignorance (Asher, L, trans) (London: Faber & Faber, 2003) p 123 Google Scholar.

78. Locke, J A Paper Concerning Human Understanding (Nidditch, PH, ed) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975)Google Scholar II x 2.

79. While Aristotle concentrates on the temporal aspects of memory (see Lang, HS ‘on memory: Aristotle's corrections of Plato’ (1980) 18 Journal of the History of Philosophy 379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar), St Augustine of Hippo, writing in the fourth century AD, emphasises the personal nature of the experience. The ‘vast court of my memory’ is also where ‘I meet with myself’. For Augustine, the uniqueness of the human soul means that memory remains an experience that is bound to the individual. Although I can communicate memories to others in conversation or in writing, the other can never truly share the experience because memory ‘belongs unto my nature’. See The Confessions of St Augustine (EB Pusey, trans) (London: Dent, 1970) 10.8.

80. Halbwachs, M On Collective Memory (Coser, LA, trans) (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992)Google Scholar.

81. Ibid, p 53.

82. Ibid.

83. Hegel, Gwf Phenomenology of Spirit (Miller, AV, trans) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977)Google Scholar para 175.

84. Ibid, para 178.

85. A similar argument has been advanced by the social historian Amos Funkenstein. See Funkenstein, A Perceptions of Jewish History (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993) p 5 Google Scholar.

86. Hegel, above n 83, para 508.

87. Forster, MN Hegel's Idea of a Phenomenology of Spirit (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998) p 84 Google Scholar.

88. Hegel, above n 83, para 177.

89. Ibid, para 808. See further Nuzzo, above n 4.

90. Hegel, above n 83, para 808.

91. On ‘lived concreteness’, see Nuzzo, above n 4, p 16. See also Buber, M Eclipse of God: Studies in the Relation between Religion and Philosophy (New York: Harper, 1952) p 63 Google Scholar.

92. For Elias, ‘the fortunes of a nation over the centuries become sedimented into the habitus of individual members’. Elias, N The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Schöter, M, ed, E Dunning and S Mennell, trans) (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996), p 19 Google Scholar, emphasis in original.

93. Ibid.

94. Elias, N The Civilising Process (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000) p 455 Google Scholar.

95. Bergson, H Matter and Memory (NM Paul and W Scott Palmar, trans) (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1950) p 74 Google Scholar.

96. Ibid.

97. Deleuze, G Bergsonism (H Tomlinson and B Habberjam, trans) (New York: Zone Books, 1991) p 55 Google Scholar.

98. Ibid.

99. Kerslake, C Deleuze and the Unconscious (London: Continuum, 2007) p 17 Google Scholar.

100. Bergson, above n 95, pp 176–177.

101. Ibid, p 194.

102. There is no more reason, Bergson suggests, ‘to say that the past effaces itself as soon as perceived, than there is to suppose that material objects cease to exist when we cease to perceive them’. Ibid, p 182.

103. Ibid, p 220.

104. Ibid, pp 130 and 162.

105. Ibid, p 206.

106. Ibid, pp 89–95.

107. Ibid, pp 92–93.

108. Ibid, p 94.

109. This is the theory that ‘the larger the drop in output that a country suffered between 1938 and 1950, the faster it grew subsequently’. B Eichengreen and A Ritschl Understanding West German Economic Growth in the 1950s SFB 649 Discussion Paper 2008-068 at 4.

110. See TW Guinnane Financial Vergangenheitsbewältigung: The 1953 London Debt Agreement Yale University Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper (No 880, 2004), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=493802

111. Bergson, above n 95, p 220.

112. Deleuze, G Difference and Repetition (P Patton, trans) (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994) p 77 Google Scholar.

113. Ibid.

114. This is particularly obvious in the common law tradition. In classical common law theory, the common law was understood to be the ‘accumulated wisdom of the ages’. According to this view, the ‘community’ was Gemeinschaftlich, it was the source or ‘bank’ of collective knowledge and wisdom. See Postema, GJ Bentham and the Common Law Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) p 63 Google Scholar, quoting Blackstone (1 Comm 442). At the same time, the common law, ever ‘bent on action’, develops in an incremental manner.

115. Savelsberg and Ryan argue that collective memory induces path dependency, but reach this conclusion in the context of a theoretical framework inspired by Halbwachs' work. See Savelsberg and Ryan, above n 2, ch 4. This provides further support for the proposition that Bergson's analysis offers instructive insights for traditional collective memory scholarship.

116. Goodhart, Cae and Illing, G Financial Crises, Contagion and the Lender of Last Resort: A Reader (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) p 1 Google Scholar.

117. Bagehot, W Lombard Street: A Description of the Money Market (New York: John Wiley, 1873/1999) pp 196–197 Google Scholar.

118. On this point, see Goodhart, Cae Monetary Theory and Practice (London: Macmillan, 1984) p 212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

119. The risk of moral hazard needs to be balanced against the potential loss resulting from systemic panic when a central bank refuses to act as a LOLR. On this point, see Goodhart, Cae ‘Myths about a lender of last resort’ (1999) 2 International Finance 339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 353. This is what Isaiah Berlin calls a tragic choice for which there are no easy answers'. The central bank must bear the ‘burden of [such] judgment’ on its shoulders. On ‘tragic choices’, see Alder, J ‘Dissents in courts of last resort: tragic choices?’ (2000) 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 224.

120. As with individual banks, the question arises whether it is possible to distinguish between illiquidity and insolvency. Goodhart argues that this notion is a myth. On this account, ‘nowadays illiquidity implies at least a suspicion of insolvency’. See Goodhart, above n 119, at 345.

121. M Rodewald ‘“No one's safe” in this economic crisis’ (Interview with Paul Krugman) Financial Times 20 November 2011, available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7bbcfba0-1060-11e1-8211-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1nnu6l93L

122. R Buergin ‘Schaeuble rejects ECB as lender of last resort, joint European bond sales’Bloomberg 15 January 2012, available at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-15/schaeuble-rejects-ecb-as-lender-of-last-resort-joint-european-bond-sales.html

123. Gray and O'Callaghan, above n 10, at 29.

124. P De Grauwe Only a More Active ECB Can Solve the Euro Crisis CEPS Policy Brief (No 250, 2011). Bain and Howells explain that the Base Multiplier Model implies that ‘the stock of the money is given by the size of the base’, but they subject this view to criticism. Bain, K and Howells, P Monetary Economics, Policy and Its Theoretical Basis (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd edn, 2009) pp 38 and 114 Google Scholar.

125. On the liquidity provided and the question of price stability, see A Orphanides ‘Monetary policy lessons from the crisis’ in Eijffinger, S and Masciandaro, D (eds) Handbook of Central Banking, Financial Regulation and Supervision (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011) pp 30–65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

126. On this point, see C Dreger and J Wolters Money and Inflation in the Euro Area during the Financial Crisis Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Discussion Paper (No 1131, 2011). See also De Grauwe, P Economics of Monetary Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009) p 220 Google Scholar.

127. De Grauwe, ibid, p 221.

128. De Grauwe, above n 124, at 4.

129. Feldstein, M ‘the failure of the euro’ (2012) 91 Foreign Affairs 105 Google Scholar.

130. Editorial Comment, ‘the Greek sovereign debt tragedy: approaching the final act? (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review 1769 at 1769.

131. Auer, S ‘Europe between reckless optimism and reckless despair’ (2012) 28 Policy 19 Google Scholar at 22.