Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:43:07.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accessory Liability, by Paul S Davies. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015, xxxiii + 285 + (index) 7pp (£58 hardback). ISBN 978-1-84946-287-7.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

William Day
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 382 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

43. PS Davies Accessory Liability (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015) p 285.

44. The language of ‘aid, abet, counsel or procure’ from s 8 of the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 may be more familiar to some readers. ‘Assist, encourage or procure’ is a more modern and accessible recasting of the same requirements: see Law Commission Participating in Crime, Law Com No 305 (2007).

45. Davies, above n 1, p 53. However, Davies suggests that the conduct requirement is still a ‘real barrier’: ibid, p 285.

46. Baden v Société Générale pour Favouriser le Développement du Commerce et de l’Industrie en France SA [1993] 1 WLR 509 (Ch) at [246] (Peter Gibson J).

47. [1995] 2 AC 378 (PC) at 387–391.

48. [2002] UKHL 12, [2002] 2 AC 164 at [134]. The authorities are usefully set out in L Tucker, N Le Poidevin QC and J Brightwell Lewin on Trusts (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2015), [40-035]–[40-038].

49. Davies, above n 1, pp 119–121.

50. Ibid, p 121.

51. (1853) 2 E & B 216.

52. OBG Ltd v Allan UKHL 21, [2008] 1 AC 1 at [1] (Lord Hoffmann).

53. Ibid, at [192], [202].

54. Ibid, eg at [39] (Lord Hoffmann), [168]–[172] and [189] (Lord Nicholls).

55. Davies, above n 1, p 150.

56. Ibid, pp 150–153. See eg British Motor Trade v Salvadori [1949] Ch 566 and Lictor Anstalt v Mir Steel UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 3310 (Ch), [2012] 1 All ER (Comm) 592.

57. [1988] AC 1013 (HL) and [2000] 1 AC 486 (HL).

58. Ibid, p 196.

59. [2015] UKSC 10, [2015] 2 WLR 994 at [37] (Lord Sumption) see also eg at [41] (Lord Sumption) and at [55] and [57] (Lord Neuberger).

60. Lord Sumption, for instance, referred to the need for there to be ‘common intent’: ibid, at [41].

61. Davies, above n 1, pp 206–209.

62. [2015] UKSC 10, [2015] 2 WLR 994 at [67]. See also at [27] (Lord Toulson).

63. Davies, above n 1, pp 20–21.

64. Ibid, pp 15, 212.

65. Ibid, pp 230–234.

66. Ibid, p 31.

67. Ibid, pp 33–37.

68. Ibid, p 9.

69. Ibid, p 216.

70. Ibid, p 220.

71. Ibid, p 3.

72. [2013] EWCA Civ 544, [2013] 1 WLR 3700 at [2] (Beatson LJ).

73. See eg W Day ‘Skirting around the issue: the corporate veil after Prest v Petrodel’ [2014] Lloyd's Mar & Com L Q 269 at 288–296.

74. Davies, above n 1, p v.