Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T16:26:34.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social and Labour Rights in a Global Context: International and Comparative Perspectives edited by Bob Hepple, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, xxi + 257 + (index) 16 pp (£45.00 hardback). ISBN 0 521 81881 8.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Tonia Novitz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 363 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 K Klare ‘The Horizons of Transformative Labour and Employment Law’ in J Conaghan, Fischl, R M and Mare, K Labour Law in an Era of Globalization: Transformative Practices and Possibilities (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) p 4 Google Scholar.

2 Eg N Bacon and J Storey ‘New Employee Relations Strategies in Britain: Towards Individualism or Partnership?’ (2000) 38 Br J Ind Relations 407; J Mcllroy ‘The New Politics of Pressure — The Trades Union Congress and New Labour in Government’ (2000) 31 Ind Relations J 2; and T Novitz ‘A Revised Role for Trade Unions as Designed by New Labour: The Representation Pyramid and “Partnership”’ (2002) 29 JLS 487.

3 See also, as regards identification of this problem, Bruun, N Transnational Trade Union Rights in the European Union (Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet, 1998 Google Scholar); and P Germanotta Protecting Worker Solidarity Action: A Critique of International Labour Law (London: Institute of Employment Rights, 2002).

4 For doubts expressed as to the ‘democratic credentials' of the’ Convention’ which drafted the Charter, see C McCrudden’ The Future of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights‘, Jean Monnet Working Paper no 10/01, p 11; G de Búrca’ The Drafting of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights' (2001) 26 ELR 126 at 131–133; and T Eicke, ‘The European Charter of Fundamental Rights — Unique Opportunity or Unwelcome Distraction’ [2000] European Human Rights LR 280 at 281.

5 It should be noted that this is a view which has been challenged elsewhere. See eg K D Ewing ‘Social Rights and Constitutional Law’ [1999] PL 105.

6 Case C-212/97 Centros v Erhvers-og Selskabsstyrelsen [1999] ECR 1–1459.

7 UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Concluding Observations on the Report of Nigeria UN Doc E/C.12/1/Add.23, 13 May 1998.

8 See the jurisprudence developed by the Committee of Independent Experts relating to arts 1(1), 2(1), 12(3), 14 and 18; summarised in L Samuel Fundamental Social Rights: Case Law of the European Social Charter (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2nd edn, 2002).

9 Discussed in detail in J Earnshaw and S Hardy ‘Assessing an Arbitral Route for Unfair Dismissal’ (2001) 30 Ind LJ 289.