Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:48:32.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Open Justice: A Critique of the Public Trial by Joseph Jaconelli, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, xl + 364 + (index) 5 pp (£50.00 hardback). ISBN 0 19 825258 7.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Eric Barendt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 182 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. [1913] AC 417.

2. Associated Newspapers v London (North) Industrial Tribunal [1998] IRLR 569 at para 39.

3. However, the book explores the interests of parties and witnesses, in particular identifying the circumstances in which there is a departure from the open justice requirement in order to protect their security or privacy.

4. Richmond Newspapers v Virginia 448 US 555 (US SC. 1980); Canadian Broadcasting Corpn v A-G for New Brunswick [1996] 3 SCR 480, Can SC.

5. Under the Criminal Justice Act 1988, s 159, the media and any other ‘person aggrieved’ may appeal against an order restricting access of the public to a trial on indictment. But that does not confer a right to attend.

6. R v Dover Justices, ex p Dover District Council [1992] Crim LR 371, DC.