Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:22:22.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Pluralism in European Contract Law by Vanessa Mak. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, 288 pp (£80.00 hardback). ISBN: 978-0-19-885448-7.

Review products

Legal Pluralism in European Contract Law by Vanessa Mak. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, 288 pp (£80.00 hardback). ISBN: 978-0-19-885448-7.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2021

Luca Siliquini-Cinelli Open the ORCID record for Luca Siliquini-Cinelli [Opens in a new window]
Luca Siliquini-Cinelli*
Affiliation:
University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 178 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society of Legal Scholars

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schwab, K The Fourth Industrial Revolution (London: Penguin, 2017)Google Scholar.

2 Uber BV and others (Appellants) v Aslam and others (Respondents) [2021] UKSC 5 On appeal from [2018] EWCA Civ 2748, press summary available at https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2019-0029.html.

3 My translation. For further information, see https://milano.repubblica.it/cronaca/2021/02/24/news/rider_uber_aperta_procuratore_di_milano_aperta_indagine_fiscale-288999387/.

4 Mak, V Legal Pluralism in European Contract Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Ibid, p 3. See also ibid, pp 11, 21.

6 Ibid, p 5. See also ibid, p 231.

7 Ibid, p 9. See also ibid, p 232 ff.

8 See eg Ibid, pp 11, 14, 16, Ch 2.

9 Ibid, p 51.

10 Ibid, p 11.

11 Ibid, p 11.

12 See eg Schauer, F ‘Institutions and the concept of law: a reply to Ronald Dworkin (with some help from Neil MacCormick)’ in Del Mar, M and Bankowski, Z (eds) Law as an Institutional Normative Order (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009) pp 35–44, 43Google Scholar: ‘the central feature of modern legality [is] its institutional status’.

13 Mak (n 4) pp 11, 16, Ch 3, pp 153, 189, 200, 208.

14 Ibid, p 94.

15 Ibid, p 95.

16 Ibid, p 11.

17 Ibid, p 35.

18 Ibid. See also ibid, pp 39–45, 60–64.

19 Ibid, p 35.

20 Ibid, p 35.

21 For other examples, see ibid, p 234 ff.

22 Ibid, p 49.

23 Ibid, p 49.

24 Ibid, p 75. See also ibid, p 79.

25 Ibid, p 48.

26 Ibid, p 49.

27 Ibid, p 49.

28 Ibid, p 92.

29 Ibid, p 49.

30 Ibid, p 14.

31 Ibid, p 96.

32 Ibid, p 127. See also ibid, p 1.

33 Ibid, p 229.

34 Ibid, p 129.

35 Ibid, p 154. See further ibid, Ch 9.

36 Ibid, p 154 ff.

37 Ibid, p 154.

38 Ibid, p 154.

39 Ibid, p 135.

40 Ibid, p 16.

41 Namely, ‘that lawmaking by private actors in the platform economy does not lead per se to lower levels of consumer protection but that certain risks are [nonetheless] present’: ibid, p 203.

42 Ibid, p 208.

43 Ibid, p 221.

44 Ibid, p 230.