No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
48. BBC News Online ‘North Carolina pair feud over leg’ 2 October 2007.
49. ‘TV judge to decide who gets amputated leg’ available at http://www.usatoday.com/community/utils/idmap/29945868.story.
50. Hardcastle, p 20.
51. Ibid, p 203.
52. Ibid.
53. Ibid, p 36.
54. Ibid, p 100.
55. Eg D Price ‘Property, Harm and the Corpse' in Brooks-Gordan, B, Ebtehaj, F, Herring, J, Johnson, M, and Richards, M Death Rites and Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar
56. Hardcastle, p 20.
57. Ibid, p 143.
58. Ibid.
59. Ibid, p 147.
60. Ibid., p 201.
61. Ibid 204.
62. Ibid 203.
63. Ibid.
64. P-L Chau and J Herring ‘My body, your body, our bodies' (2007) 15 Medical Law Review 34.
65. Ploski v Poland (1995), Pannullo and Forte v France (1997), Jones v UK (2005).
66. Eg M Brazier ‘Retained organs: ethics and humanity’ (2002) 22 Legal Studies 550; M Maclean ‘Letting Go…Parents, Professionals and the Law in the Retention of Human Material after Post Mortem’ in Bainham, A, Day Sclater, S and Richards, M (eds) Body Lore and Laws (Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar