No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
1. Leith, P and Ingram, P (eds) The Jurisprudence of Orthodoxy, Queen's University, essays on H.L.A. Hurt (London: Routledge, 1988).Google Scholar
2. Honoré, A H ‘Real Laws’ in Hacker, P M and Raz, J (eds) Law, Morality and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977) p 117.Google Scholar
3. We can see this in the theory of speech acts. This theory, developed by J L Austin, emerged from a series of seminars conducted by him and H L A Hart shortly after the war. It owes something to Hart who, on the basis of his pre-war practice as a lawyer, pointed to the analogy between ‘performative utterances’ and such formal legal acts as marriage and the making of wills. See Bankowski, Z and MacCormick, D ‘Speech Acts, Legal Institutions and Real Laws’ in Birks, P and MacCormick, D N (eds) The Legal Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986) pp 121–135.Google Scholar
4. H L A Hart The Concept of Law 2nd edn with a postscript edited by Bullock, P A and Raz, J (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994) pp 238–239.Google Scholar