Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:40:37.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-Terrorism by Kent Roach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011 xiv + 462 + (index) 14pp (£19.99 paperback). ISBN: 13: 9780521185059.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Andrew Lynch
Andrew Lynch*
Affiliation:
Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law, University of New South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 673 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

72. Daniels, RJ, Macklem, P and Roach, K The Security of Freedom: Essays on Canada's Anti-Terrorism Bill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

73. Roach, K, The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-Terrorism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011) p 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

74. See, eg, Donohue, LK The Cost of Counter-Terrorism: Power, Politics and Liberty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

75. Of which, the leading title is co-edited by Roach: Ramraj, V et al (eds) Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn, 2012)Google Scholar. See also Siniver, A (ed) International Terrorism Post-9/11: Comparative Dynamics and Responses (London: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar

76. Roach, , above n 73, p 5.Google Scholar

77. Garland, D The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001) p 2.Google Scholar

78. Roach, , above n 73, p 6.Google Scholar

79. Scheppele, KL ‘The constitutional role of transnational courts: principled legal ideas in three-dimensional political space’ (2010) 28 Penn State International Law Review 451 at 452.Google Scholar

80. Roach, , above n 73, p 6.Google Scholar See also K Roach ‘The criminal law and its less restrained alternatives’ in Ramraj, et al, above n 75, p 117.Google Scholar

81. Roach, , above n 73, p 19.Google Scholar

82. See also Tushnet, M ‘The political constitution of emergency powers: parliamentary and separation-of-powers regulation’ (2007) 3 International Journal of Law in Context 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

83. On the significance of Australia's criminal trials of persons for terrorism-related activity, see McGarrity, N “Testing’ our counter-terrorism laws’ (2010) 34 Criminal Law Journal 92.Google Scholar

84. Roach, , above n 75, p 356.Google Scholar

85. Independent National Security Legislation Monitor Act 2010 (Cth), s 3.

86. See Lynch, A ‘The impact of post-enactment review on anti-terrorism laws: four jurisdictions compared’ (2012) 18 Journal of Legislative Studies 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

87. A v Secretary of State [2004] UKHL 56.

88. Charkaoui v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) [2007] 1 SCR 350.

89. Especially Hamdan v Rumsfeld [2006] 548 US 557; Boumediene v . Bush [2008] 553 US 723.

90. Goldsmith, J The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush Administration (New York: Norton, 2007).Google Scholar

91. Ibid, p 132.

92. Roach, , above n 75, p 13.Google Scholar

93. Roach, K ‘Sources and trends in post-9/11 anti-terrorism laws’ in Goold, BJ and Lazarus, L Security and Human Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2007) ch 10.Google Scholar

94. See CH Powell ‘The United Nations Security Council, terrorism and the rule of law’ in Ramraj, et al, above n 75, ch 2Google Scholar; Rosand, E ‘The Security Council as ‘global legislator’: ultra vires or ultra innovative?’ (2004–2005) 28 Fordham International Law Journal 542.Google Scholar

95. CH Powell ‘The legal authority of the United Nations Security Council’ in Goold, and Lazarus, , above n 93, p 166.Google Scholar

96. Roach, , above n 75, p 51.Google Scholar

97. Roach, , above n 93, pp 242–245 Google Scholar; Roach, K, ‘The world wide expansion of anti-terrorism laws after 11 September 2001’ (2004) 3 Studi Senesi 487 at 490–503.Google Scholar

98. A Lynch ‘Legislating anti-terrorism: observations on form and process’ in Ramraj, et al, above n 75, ch 7.Google Scholar

99. Roach, , above n 75, p 432.Google Scholar

100 Ibid, p 1.

101 See, eg, Walker, C ‘Intelligence and anti-terrorism legislation in the United Kingdom’ (2005) 44 Crime, Law and Social Change 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

102 Goldsmith, , above n 90, p 215.Google Scholar