Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:48:00.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Globalisation of the Australian Legal Profession in the Asian Century: a Report of the Paper Presented at the Joint Study Institute, 2013

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2013

Celine Kelly
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This piece, by Celine Kelly, is a report on a paper that was presented at the JSI 2013 in Melbourne and explores the key points made by Andrew Godwin on the globalisation and liberalisation of legal services in the Australasia region. The talk included a discussion on the pros and cons of globalisation and case studies of legal services in South Korea, Singapore, Japan, China, India and Australia.

Keywords

globalisationlegal services
Type
Conference Report
Information
Legal Information Management , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 209 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2013. Published by British and Irish Association of Law Librarians 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Footnotes

1 General Agreement on Trade in Services, 15 April 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1B, The Legal Texts: The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations 284 (1999), 1869 UNTS 183, 33 ILM 1167 (1994).

2 Report of the Committee to Develop the Singapore Legal Sector, September 2007.

3 Godwin, Andrew. (2009) The Professional ‘Tug of War’: The Regulation of Foreign Lawyers in China, Business Scope Issues and Some Suggestions for Reform. Melbourne University Law Review, 33(1), 132–162.Google Scholar

4 Lawyers Collective v. Chadbourne et al. (WP1526/1995).

5 Bar Council of India v. M V Dhabolkar [1976] AIR 242.

6 AK Balaji v The Government of India et al. (WP 5614/2010).