Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:14:21.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classification Practice in Law Libraries: a Brief Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2008

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article by Rachel Brett of Lovells reports on the results of a survey into classification practice in law libraries carried out through the BIALL and LIS-Law mailing lists in March 2007. Major findings were that only three respondents did not use any form of subject classification. The most frequently used classification scheme was Moys, and the single largest grouping was the 40 respondents (40.8%) who used their own in-house classification schemes.

Keywords

Classificationlaw libraries
Type
Articles
Information
Legal Information Management , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 61 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © The British and Irish Association of Law Librarians 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clinch, Peter. (2001). FLAG project: survey results. Legal Information Management 1(2), 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinch, Peter. (2002). The Grand Tour. Legal Information Management 2(4), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. (2002). Classification: are we overdoing it? Library and Information Update 1(1), 24.Google Scholar
Moys, E. M. (2001). Moys Classification and Thesaurus for Legal Materials. 4th ed.Munich, K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Ian. (1989). Cataloguing and Classification Practice in Law Libraries. Law Librarian 20(2), 62–64.Google Scholar