Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:35:12.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Best-Kept Secret(s) of Evidence Based Policing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2016

Abstract

This paper draws on the work of the Evidence and Insight Team, a dedicated research function presently at the Mayor's Office for Policing And Crime, previously based within the Metropolitan Police Service for over a decade. The aim of the paper is to make readers aware of the obliquely hidden data goldmine that exists within UK policing. Such data captures the decisions police make routinely, the kinds of situations police encounter and with whom. This rich data seam goes beyond crime – and should be used more outside of policing. The authors, Paul Dawson and Elizabeth A. Stanko, argue that interested academics need a better roadmap of the data in order to stimulate basic knowledge and usage. Three case studies are presented that illustrate the scope and challenges of working with such data.

Type
Sources and Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice Research
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016. Published by British and Irish Association of Law Librarians 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, K. (2009) The Bradley Report: Lord Bradley's review of people with mental health problemsor learning disabilities in the criminal justice system. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Chan, J. (1997) Changing police culture: Policing in a multicultural society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, N. (2004) “Intelligence led policing or policing led intelligence?” Integrating volume crime analysis into policing. The British Journal of Criminology, 44, 188203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, P., Goodwill, A.M. & Dixon, L. (2014) Preliminary insights and analysis into weapon enabled sexual offenders. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 6(3), 174184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, P., & Stanko, B. (2013) Implementation, implementation, implementation: Insights from offender management evaluations. Policing, 7(3), 289298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, P., & Williams, E. (2009) Reflections from a police research unit—An inside job. Policing, 3(4), 373380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, R. (2008) Final report of the independent review of policing commissioned by the Home Secretary and conducted by Sir Ronnie Flanagan. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1964) Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social problems, 11(3), 225250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohl, K., & Stanko, E.A. (2015) Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: Fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 1477370815571949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HMIC. (2011) The rules of engagement: A review of the August 2011 disorders. London: HMIC.Google Scholar
Lum, C., Telep, C., Koper, C., & Grieco, J. (2012) Receptivity to research in policing. Justice,Research and Policy, 14(1), 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metropolitan Police Service. (2011) Four Days in August. London: Metropolitan Police Service.Google Scholar
Reiner, R. (1992) The politics of the police (2nd ed.). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Jennings, W.G., Lynch, M.D., & Fridell, L.A. (2015) Evaluating the impact of police officer body-worn cameras (BWCs) on response-to-resistance and serious external complaints: Evidence from the Orlando police department (OPD) experience utilizing a randomized controlled experiment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 480486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanko, B., & Dawson, P. (2013) Reflections on the Offending Histories of those Arrested during the Disorder. Policing, 7(1), 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanko, E., & Dawson, P. (2015) Police Use of Research Evidence: Recommendations for Improvement, Springer.Google Scholar