Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:13:03.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Syngamy Debate: When Precisely Does a Human Life Begin?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

Stephen Buckle ,
Karen Dawson  and
Peter Singer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Infertility (Medical Procedures) Act passed by the Parliament of Victoria, Australia in 1984 was the first legislation anywhere in the world to deal specifically with the regulation of in vitro fertilization and embryo experimentation. As with any pioneering legislation, it has had its problems. Prominent among them was the question of precisely when an embryo comes into existence. This question, which may seem mere semantics, gave rise to a heated controversy with real practical consequences for researchers and infertile couples. The issue was only resolved by the Victorian parliament passing an amendment which specified, more precisely than any legislature had done before, the moment at which egg and sperm become an embryo. This enactment could be seen as a legal declaration of when a life begins—although it remains an open question what legal or ethical significance such a starting point possesses.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , Summer 1989 , pp. 174 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

For a discussion of the basis of this prohibition, see Kuhse, H. Singer, P., “The Ethics of Embryo Research,” Law, Medicine and Health Care 1986, 14(3–4): 133–38.Google Scholar
Strictly speaking, the problem was not section 6(5), since this had not been proclaimed, and so had no legal force at this time. Section 29, however, required SRACI to have regard to the spirit and intent of the Act in its work. The committee held that this required it to have regard to section 6(5), even though it had not been proclaimed.Google Scholar
Harrison, R.G., Clinical Embryology, London: Academic Press, 1978, p. 4.Google Scholar
The St. Vincent's Bioethics Centre is a Victorian centre for research in bioethics which supports Roman Catholic approaches to issues in bioethics. The submission was published anonymously under the title “Identifying the Origin of a Human Life,” in St. Vincent's Bioethics Newsletter 1987, 5(1): 4–6.Google Scholar
See Dawson, K., “Fertilisation and Moral Status,” Journal of Medical Ethics 1987 13:173–78.Google Scholar
“Identifying the Origin of a Human Life,” supra note 4, 4.Google Scholar
See Dawson, K., “Segmentation and Moral Status,” Bioethics 1988, 2(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
See Singer, P. Dawson, K., “IVF Technology and the Argument from Potential,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1988, 17: 87–104.Google Scholar
See Dawson, K., supra note 5.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, M. Trounson, A., “The Influence of Seminal Characteristics on the Success Rate of Human In Vitro Fertilization,” Fertility and Sterility, 42: 400–05.Google Scholar
Kola, I. Trounson, A. Dawson, G. Rogers, P., “Tripronuclear Human Oocytes: Altered Cleavage Patterns and Subsequent Karyotypic Analysis of Embryos,” Biology of Reproduction 1987, 37: 395–401.Google Scholar
Jacobs, P. et al., “The Origins of Human Triploids,” Annals of Human Genetics, 42: 49–57; Sherard, et al., “Long Survival in a 69XXY Triploid Male,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, 25: 307–12. We owe these references to the article by Kola, Trounson, Dawson, Rogers, , cited above.Google Scholar
For a discussion of possible genetic changes after this point, see Dawson, , supra note 5.Google Scholar
Secs. 4(2) and 4(4)(d).Google Scholar
See Dawson, , supra notes 5 and 7.Google Scholar
For one argument that it is not morally important when a new human being begins to exist, see Kuhse, H. Singer, P., supra note 1.Google Scholar