Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:02:50.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prescriptive Authority for Nurses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
NLE Rounds
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

N. H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §326-B: 10(II) as amended.Google Scholar
See Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, §§15711584 (1983).Google Scholar
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, §2022(7) (1983).Google Scholar
Vt. Admin. Comp. (Vt. Board of Nursing) § N 11.04(B)(3) (1983).Google Scholar
Utah Code Ann. §58-3la-2 (Supp. 1983).Google Scholar
Wash. Admin. Code R. 308-120-410, 440, 450 (1980).Google Scholar
Tenn. Admin. Comp. ch. 1000-4-.03.Google Scholar
Tenn. Admin. Comp. ch. 1000-4-.03(2).Google Scholar
An exception is the Colorado Child Health Associate Law which lists categories of drugs from which a child health associate, who need not be a nurse, may prescribe with the approval of the Colorado medical board. Colo. Rev. Stat. §§12-31-102(2), 3(2) (1978).Google Scholar
Wash. Rev. Code Ann. §18.88280(16) (1978).Google Scholar
Idaho Board of Nursing, Minimum Standards, Rules and Regulations §§3-4007.03-.04.Google Scholar
See Standards of Practice for Nurse-Midwifery in the State of Mississippi (promulgated by the Mississippi State Board of Nursing, October 3, 1983).Google Scholar
Vt. Admin. Comp. §N 11.04(B)(3) (1983).Google Scholar
This is true even though the telephone prescription of certain controlled substances must be followed by a written prescription within 24 hours.Google Scholar
S.C. Code Ann. §44-53-395 (Law Co-op. Supp. 1983).Google Scholar
Gen, R.I.. Laws §5-37-19 (1976).Google Scholar
Sermchief v Gonzales, 660 S. W.2d 683 (Mo. banc 1983). See Wolf, M.A., Court Upholds Expanded Practice Roles for Nurses, Law, Medicine & Health Care 12(1): 26 (February 1984); Greenlaw, J., Sermchief v. Gonzales and the Need for Expanded Practice Legislation, Law, Medicine & Health Care 12(1): 30 (February 1984).Google Scholar
Mo. Rev. Stat. §335.016.8 (1984).Google Scholar
Sermchief v. Gonzales, supra note 17, at 690.Google Scholar
Id. at 689–90.Google Scholar
Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. §30-87a(b) (West Supp. 1983–1984).Google Scholar
For example, the statutory authority for nurse-midwifery practice is uncertain in only two of the 53 United States jurisdictions, as of November 1983. See Special Issue on Legislation, Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 29(2): 1 (March/April 1984) (Table 1).Google Scholar
See Letter from the California Nurses Association to Consortium for Nurse-Midwifery, October 11, 1983.Google Scholar
Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §32-1921(2) (Supp. 1977–1983).Google Scholar
See supra note 1, and accompanying text.Google Scholar
Fla. Stat. Ann. §458.331(1)(dd) (West Supp. 1983).Google Scholar