No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Flaws in Revising Medical Consent Forms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 April 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0277845900010800/resource/name/firstPage-S0277845900010800a.jpg)
- Type
- Correspondence
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1983
References
Committee on Policy for DNR Decisions, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Report on Do Not Resuscitate Decisions, Connecticut Medicine 47(8): 477–83 (August 1983).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Emory University v. Porubiansky, 282 S.E.2d 903 (Ga. 1981); Olson v. Molzen, 558 S.W.2d 429 (Tenn. 1977).Google Scholar
Protection of Human Subjects, 45 C.F.R. §46.116 (1981). “No informed consent, whether oral or written, may include any exculpatory language through which the subject or the representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the subject's legal rights, or releases or appears to release the investigator, the sponsor, the institution or its agents from liability for negligence.”Google Scholar
Levine, R. J., Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research (Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, Md.) (1981) at 101.Google Scholar