In re Quinlan, 355 A.2d 647, 672 (N.J. 1976). It is dear that this is not properly the function of an ethics committee but, rather, of a “prognosis committee.”Google Scholar

Presidents Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions (U.S. Gov't. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.) (1983) at 168–70 [hereinafter referred to as Deciding to Forego Treatment].Google Scholar

Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap; Procedures and Guidelines Relating to Health Care for Handicapped Infants; Final Rule, 49 Fed. Reg. 1621, 1623 (January 16, 1984) (to be codifed at 45 C.F.R. §84.55).Google Scholar

Kalchbrenner, J. Kelly, M.J. McCarthy, D.G., Ethics Committees and Ethicists in Catholic Hospitals, Hospital Progress 64(9): 47, 47 (September 1983).Google ScholarPubMed

Youngner, S.J., A National Survey of Ethics Committees, in Deciding to Forego Treatment, supra note 2, at 448.Google Scholar

McCormick, R.A., To Save or Let Die: The Dilemma of Modem Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association 229(2): 172, 172 (July 8, 1974).Google ScholarPubMed

Id., quoting Obstetrical and Gynecological News (April 1974).Google Scholar

McCormick, , supra note 6, at 172, quoting Maine Medical Ctr. v. Houle, No. 74–145 (Cumberland County Me. Super. February 14, 1974).Google Scholar

McCormick, R.A. Veatch, R.M., The Preservation of Life and Self Determination, Theological Studies 41(2): 390, 395–96 (June 1980).Google ScholarPubMed

In re Quinlan, 137 N.J. Super. 227, 261-63 (N.J. Super. Ct. Ch. Div. 1975).Google Scholar

People v. Barber, No. A 025586, slip op. at 2 (Cal. Super. Ct. May 5, 1983).Google Scholar

Id. at 4.Google Scholar

49 Fed. Reg. 1640–42 (January 16, 1984) (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. §84, app. C.).Google Scholar

Veatch, R.M., Ethics Committees: Are They Legitimate? Ethics Committee Newsletter 1(2): 1, 2 (November 1983).Google Scholar

Pellegrino, E., Moral Choice: The Good of the Patient and the Patient's Good, in Moral Choice and Medical Crisis (Kopelman, L. Moskop, J.C., eds.) (D. Reidel, Holland) (forthcoming 1984).Google Scholar

See Deciding to Forego Treatment, supra note 2, at 119–36.Google Scholar

Starr, P., The Social Transformation of American Medicine (Basic Books, Inc., New York, N.Y.) (1982) at 420–44.Google Scholar

Id. at 439–44.Google Scholar

Cf. Reiman, A.S., The Power of the Doctors, New York Review of Books 31(5): 29, 29 (March 29, 1984).Google Scholar

Id. at 32.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, T.L. Childress, J.F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics (Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.) (1979) at 255, citing Alien R.W., Informed Consent: A Medical Decision, Radiology 119: 233–34 (April 1976).Google Scholar

Lynn, J. Childress, J.F., Must Patients Always Be Given Food and Water, Hastings Center Report 13(5): 17 (October 1983); Micetich K. Steinecker P. Thomasma D., Are Intravenous Fluids Morally Required? Archives of Internal Medicine 143: 975–78 (1983).Google ScholarPubMed

Lynn, , Childress, supra note 22, at 18.Google Scholar

Barber v. Superior Court, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484, 492–93 (Cal App. 1983).Google Scholar

Callahan, D., On Feeding the Dying, Hastings Center Report 13(5): 22, 22 (October 1983).Google ScholarPubMed

Abram, M.B. Wolf, S.M., Public Involvement in Medical Ethics.- A Model for Governmental Action, New England Journal of Medicine 310(10): 627, 627 (March 8, 1984).Google Scholar

Shaw, A., Dilemmas of Informed Consent in Children, New England Journal of Medicine 289(17): 885, 889 (October 25, 1973).Google ScholarPubMed

Steinfels, M.O., In Vitro Fertilization. “Ethically Acceptable” Research, Hastings Center Report 9(3): 5, 5 (June 1979).Google ScholarPubMed