Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:34:27.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Editor's Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AIDS: Law and Policy, Law, Med. & Health Care 1987, 15(1 & 2):389; See also Symposium devoted to the Harvard Model AIDS Legislation Project in the American Journal of Law & Medicine, 16(1–2), 1990.Google Scholar
AIDS: Science and Epidemiology, Law, Med. & Health Care 1986, 14(5–6):225–303.Google Scholar
Life and Death Choices, Law, Med. & Health Care 1989, 17(3):205285.Google Scholar
Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy, Law, Med. & Health Care 1988, 16(1–2):5147.Google Scholar
Gilks, S.F., Ethical Imperialism (letter). New Engl. J. Med. 1990;322(3):200.Google Scholar
Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors and Others [1985] A.C. 871.Google Scholar
Layton, Robyn, a participant at London '89 and current chair of the National Bioethics Consultative Committee of Australia recently issued a Committee report on Reproductive Technology to Australia Health Ministers (August 1989).Google Scholar
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 109 S.Ct. 3040 (1989).Google Scholar
202 Cal. Ap. 3d 1230 (1988).Google Scholar
See generally, Gostin, , “Human Rights in Mental Health: A Proposal for Five International Standards Based upon the Japanese Experience,” Int'l J. Law & Psychiatry 1987, 10:353368.Google Scholar