Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:29:55.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Euthanasia: The Collision of Theory and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

Jane Robinson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As a nurse and policy analyst, my interest in the subject of active euthanasia lies in the practical consequences of formal policy (for example, ethical guidelines), as well as the consequences of having no formal policy, for therapeutic practice.

The basic assumption underpinning this paper is that policy decisions in the area of euthanasia cannot be simply ‘read off’ from any theoretical body of knowledge, but rather such decisions are always grounded in particular situations and social relationships. In this, I concur with Reedy, Minogue, and Sterk, who argue that:

The task of theoretical ethics is to arrive at knowledge. The task of clinical ethics is to arrive at a decision. The two activities are quite distinct and yet functionally related. The “right thing to do” in a clinical situation is much more a negotiated process than a deduction from the same theory.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 18 , Issue 1-2 , Summer 1990 , pp. 105 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Reedy, N.J., Minoque, J.P., Sterk, M.B., “The Critically Ill Neonate: Dilemmas in Perinatal Ethics,” Critical Care Nursing Quarterly 10;2 1987. 56–64.Google Scholar
Mahon, M.M., “Nursing Involvement in Treatment Decisions Regarding Newborns with Congenital Anomalies,” Holistic Nursing Practice. 2:2 Feb. 1988. 55–67; Horan, D.T., “Infanticide: When a Doctor's Orders Read Murder,” Neonatal Network 1:4 Feb. 1983. 20:28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horan, id.Google Scholar
Langslow, Amelda, “Most Heinous of Crimes?” Australian Nurses Journal. 14:4 October 1984. 65–66 and 69; Finch, J., “The Arthur Case,” Nursing Focus. 3:4 1981. 572–573.Google Scholar
Jameton, Andrew, “The Nurse: When Roles and Rules Conflict,” Hastings Center Report. 1977.Google Scholar
B.M.A. Euthanasia: Report of a Working Party. 1988.Google Scholar
Turton, Pat, “Last Rights,” Nursing Times. 83:17 April 29 1987. 18:19.Google Scholar
B.M.A., supra note 6.Google Scholar
Margaret Spufford. Celebration. Collins Fount. 1987.Google Scholar
Id., p. 49.Google Scholar
Id., p. 115.Google Scholar