Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:07:24.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiology and Ethics: The People's Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

Extract

To a Western audience the terms “people” and “people's perspective” could appear somewhat perplexing. Technically, every person belongs to the class of “people”; hence, to talk of “people's perspective” seems to make an artificial division within one monolithic group. This ostensibly artificial division reflects a reality that necessitates it. In a Third World context, the term “people” has a fairly distinct connotation. It is not just a majority which is governed by a system that gives all people a minimal quality of life and allows them a meaningful participation in the political process. In a Third World context “people” are a “mass”—a faceless body of massive energy to be manipulated and kept domesticated in the interest of the powerelite. It is a power-bloc that is threatening as well as inescapable.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bajaj, Jatinder K., “Francis Bacon, the First Philosopher of Modern Science: A Non-Western View,”: In Nandy, Ashih, ed. Science Hegemony and Violence. [Oxford University Press India 1988].Google Scholar
Aluares, Claude, “Science Colonialism and Violence: A Luddite View”; in Nandy, Ashish, ed. Science Hegemony and Violence. [OUP. India 1988].Google Scholar
Kothari, M.L. and Mehta, L.A., “Violence in Modern Medicine.”: Nandy, Ashish, ed. Science Hegemony and Violence. [OUP. India 1988].Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana, “Reductionist Science as Epistemological Violence”. Nandy, Ashish, ed. Science Hegemony and Violence. [OUP. India 1988].Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashish, “Science as Reason of State,” Nandy, Ashish, ed. Science Hegemony and Violence. [OUP. India 1988].Google Scholar
Marglin, Stephen A., “Towards the Decolonization of the Mind” in Dominating Knowledge, ed. Development and Politics Knowledge. [United Nations University, 1990].Google Scholar
Banuri, Tariq, “Development and the Politics of Knowledge: A Critical Interpretation of the Social Role of Modernization Theories in the Development of the Third World”, in Fredrique Apffel Marglin and Stephen Marglin, A. M., ed. Dominating Knowledge. [UNU. 1990].Google Scholar
Banuri, Tariq, “Modernization and its Discontents: A Cultural Perspective on the Theories of Development”, in Dominating Knowledge ed. Development and Politics Knowledge. [UNU. 1990].Google Scholar
Fanon, Franz, The Wretched of the Earth [Penguin Books 1967].Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo, Education for Critical Consciousness. [Continuum Book. The Seabury Press, New York1947].Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo, Pedagogy of the Oppressed. [Continuum Book. The Seabury Press, New York].Google Scholar
Bryant, J. and Khan, Kausar S., “Epidemiology and Ethics in the Face of Scarcity”. [Presented at the International Workshop on Ethics, Health Policy and Epidemiology, UCLA, August 3–5, 1990].Google Scholar
Khan, Kausar S., “Privilege or Right,” Dawn Magazine, February 22, 1991, Karachi.Google Scholar
Khan, Kausar S., “Women and Health”. [Chapter in a forthcoming book].Google Scholar
Khan, Kausar S., “Sustaining Violence”. [Dawn, Friday, September 23, 1990].Google Scholar
Mies, Maria: Women's Studies. Science, Violence and Responsibility. [Women's Studies Int. Forum. Vol. 13, No. 5. pg 433441, 1990].Google Scholar
Mies, Maria: Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale. [Zed Books 1986].Google Scholar