Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:53:17.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alcohol, Injury, and Legal Controls: Some Complex Interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

Ralph Hingson  and
Jonathan Howland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Despite considerable declines in the early 1980’s, drunk driving remains a major public health problem in the US. In 1986, 46,050 people were killed on the nation's highways. Traffic crashes are the leading cause of death in the age group 1-34 years. Alcohol is unquestionably a major contributor to these crashes. In 1986, 23,987 traffic deaths, 52 percent of the total, involved a driver or pedestrian who had been drinking, and 16,728, 36 percent of the total, involved someone with a blood alcohol level above 10 percent. Many of the victims of drunk driving crashes were not drinking at the time of the event; more than one third of alcohol related vehicular deaths were persons other than drinking drivers: passengers, other drivers or pedestrians.

Legislation may influence drinking and driving behavior, and the consequences thereof, in a variety of ways: limiting access to alcohol; restricting access to vehicles; making vehicles and roadways safer; separating drinking and driving. Taxation, dram shop laws, minimum drinking ages, server liability, land use laws pertaining to the location of alcohol outlets, and prohibitions on advertising alcoholic beverages affect the driver's access to alcohol.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , Spring 1989 , pp. 58 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ross, L., Deterring the Drinking Driver (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1982).Google Scholar
Fell, J.C. Klein, T., “The Nature of the Reduction in Alcohol in U.S. Fatal Crashes,” Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Papers Series 860038, Warrendale, Pa. Presented at SAE Conference, Detroit, 1986; U.S. Department of Transportation, 1988.Google Scholar
Perrine, M.W., “Alcohol Influences on Driving-Related Behavior: A Critical Review of Laboratory Studies on Neuro-physical, Neuromuscular and Sensory Activity,” Journal of Safety Research 5 (1973): 165–84.Google Scholar
Reed, D., “Reducing the Costs of Drinking and Driving,” in Moore, M. and Gerstein, D., eds., Alcohol and Public Policy: Beyond the Shadow of Prohibition, (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Heeren, T. Smith, R. Morelock, S. and Hingson, R., “Surrogate Measures of Alcohol Involvement in Fatal Crashes: Are Conventional Indicators Adequate?” Journal of Safety Research 16 (1985): 127–34.Google Scholar
Hingson, R. Howland, J., “Prevention of Drunk Driving Crashes Involving Young Drivers: An Overview of Legislative Countermeasures,” in Benjamin, T., ed., Young Drivers Impaired by Alcohol and Drugs, Royal Society of Medicine International Congress and Symposium Series No. 116 (London: Royal Society of Medicine, 1987).Google Scholar
Grossman, M. Coate, D. Arluke, G., Price Sensitivity of Alcoholic Beverages in the United States (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1984); Saffer, H. Grossman, M., Effects of Beer Prices and Legal Drinking Ages on Youth Motor Vehicle Fatalities (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1985); Coate, D. and Grossman, M., Effects of Alcoholic Beverage Prices and Legal Drinking Ages on Youth Alcohol Use (Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 152, 1986); Moskowitz, J.M., “The Primary Prevention of Alcohol Problems: A Critical Review of the Literature,” unpublished manuscript, 1986.Google Scholar
Cook, P.J., “The Effect of Liquor Taxes on Drinking, Cirrhosis, and Auto Accidents,” in Moore, M. Gerstein, D., eds., Alcohol and Public Policy: Beyond the Shadow of Prohibition (Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Cook, P.J. Tauchen, G., “The Effect of Minimum Drinking Age Legislation on Youthful Auto Fatalities, 1970–77,” Journal of Legal Studies XIII (1984): 169–91; Williams, A.F. Zador, P.L., “The Effect of Raising the Minimum Drinking Age on Involvement in Fatal Crashes,” Journal of Legal Studies XII (1983): 169–79; Wagenaar, A.C., “Preventing Highway Crashes by Raising the Legal Minimum Age for Drinking: An Empirical Confirmation,” Journal of Safety Research 13 (1982): 57–71; Hingson, R. Scotch, N., “Impact of Legislation Raising the Legal Drinking Age in Massachusetts from 18 to 20,” American Journal of Public Health 73(2), 1983: 163–70; U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Fatal Accident Reporting System 1985 Annual Report, DOT HS, 807 071, 1987.Google Scholar
DuMouchel, W. Williams, A. Zador, P., Raising the Alcohol Purchase Age: Its Effect on Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes in 26 States (Washington, D.C.: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 1985).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1986.Google Scholar
Williams, A.F. Karpf, R.S. Zador, P.L., “Variations in Minimum Licensing Age and Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes,” American Journal of Public Health 73 (1983): 1403–10; Williams, A.F. Lund, A.K., “Teenage Driver Licensing in Relation to State Laws,” Accident Analysis and Prevention 17 (1985): 135–45.Google Scholar
Preusser, D.F., “The Effect of Curfew Laws on Motor Vehicle Crashes”, Law and Policy 6 (1984): 115–28.Google Scholar
National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Transportation Research Board Special Report 204, 55 (1984) A Decade of Experience.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Transportation, Interim Report on the Safety Consequences of Raising the Speed Limit on Rural Interstate Highways, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, May, 1988.Google Scholar
Hingson, , “Effects of Maine's 1982 Driving-Under-the-Influence Legislation”, American Journal of Public Health 77 (1987): 593–97.Google Scholar
Campbell, , in press. ??Google Scholar
Hingson, R., “Repeal of the Massachusetts Seat Belt Law”, American Journal of Public Health 78 (1988): 548–52; Williams, A.F., 1988.Google Scholar
Graham, J. Garber, S., “Evaluating the Effects of Automobile Safety Regulation”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 3 (1984): 206–24.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1985.Google Scholar
Zador, P. Lund, A. Fields, M. Weinberg, K., Fatal Crash Involvement and Laws against Alcohol-Impaired Driving (Washington D.C.: The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 1988).Google Scholar
Hingson, , supra note 18.Google Scholar
Ross, , supra note 1.Google Scholar
Hingson, , supra note 16.Google Scholar
Ibid.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J.B. Strossen, N., “Mass Investigations without Individualized Suspicion: A Constitutional and Policy Critique of Drunk Driving Roadblocks,” U.C. Davis Law Review 18 (1985): 595–680.Google Scholar
Ross, , supra note 1.Google Scholar
Goffman, E., The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (New York: Doubleday, Garden City, 1959).Google Scholar
Ross, , supra note 1.Google Scholar
Hingson, , supra note 18.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. Wolfson, M. Harvey, D.S., Chapter Survey Report of the Project on Citizens' Movement against Drunk Driving (Washington, D.C., Center for the Study of Youth Development, The Catholic University of America, 1987).Google Scholar
Hatos, S., U.S. Department of Transportation, personal communication, 1987.Google Scholar
McCarthy, , supra note 31.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control, “Behavioral Risk-Factor Surveillance–-Selected States, 1984,” Morbidity and Mortality Report 35(16), 1986: 253–54; CDC, “Behavioral Risk-Factor Surveillance–-Selected States, 1986,” Morbidity and Mortality Report 36(16), 1987: 252–54.Google Scholar
Goldman, L. Cook, E.F., “The Decline in Ischemic Heart Disease Mortality Rates,” Annals of Internal Medicine 101 (1984): 825–36.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., “The New Temperance: Anti-Alcohol Trend Rises in Middle Class,” Boston Globe, April 11, 1988.Google Scholar
Gallup, G., “Public Backs Strong Measures to Fight Alcohol, Drug Abuse,” The Gallup Poll, December 18, 1986.Google Scholar
Hingson, R. Scotch, N., supra note 9.Google Scholar
Hingson, R. Howland, J., supra note 6.Google Scholar
Andeneas, J., “The Effects of Scandinavia's Drinking-and-Driving Laws: Facts and Hypotheses,” Scandinavian Studies in Criminology 6 (1978): 35–53.Google Scholar
Puska, P. Salonen, J., “Change in Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease during 10 Years of a Community Intervention Programme (North Karelia Project),” British Medical Journal 287 (1983: 1840–44; Farquhar, J.W., “The Community-Based Model of Life-Style Intervention Trial,” American Journal of Epidemiology 108 (1978): 103–11; Jacobs, D.R. Luepker, R.V., “Community-Wide Prevention Strategies: Evaluation Design of the Minnesota Heart Program,” unpublsihed report supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. Kagay, M., Prevention Index 1987, A Report Card on the Nation's Health, 1987, Rodale Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Zador, Lund, , supra note 21.Google Scholar
Casement, M.R., “Change from a Perspective of Five Years,” Alcohol Health and Research World II (1987): 32–37.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Transportation, supra note 9.Google Scholar
Ibid.Google Scholar
Ibid.Google Scholar
Ibid.Google Scholar