Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:55:26.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Who Is the Guilty Party? Rights, Motherhood, and the Problem of Prenatal Drug Exposure

Review products

Gomez Laura, Misconceiving Mothers: Legislators, Prosecutors, and the Politics of Prenatal Drug Exposure. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1997. Pp. x+256. $59.95 cloth; $19.95 paper.

Roberts Dorothy, Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Pantheon Books, 1997. Pp. x+384. $26.00 cloth; $14.00 paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essays
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank Helena Silverstein, Jill Locke, and Laurie Naranch for their helpful and generous comments and suggestions.

References

Ashe, Marie (1992) “The ‘Bad Mother’ in Law and Literature: A Problem of Representation,” 43 Hastings Law J. 10171037.Google Scholar
Ashe, Marie (1993) “'Bad Mothers,' 'Good Lawyers,' and 'Legal Ethics,'” 81 Georgetown Law J. 25332566.Google Scholar
Boling, Patricia, ed. (1995) Expecting Trouble: Surrogacy, Fetal Abuse, and New Reproductive Technologies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Chavkin, Wendy, Breithburt, Vicki, Elman, Deborah, & Wise, Paul. (1998) “National Survey of the States: Policies and Practices Regarding Drug-Using Pregnant Women,” 88 American J. of Public Health 117119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condit, Dierdre (1995) “Fetal Personhood: Political Identity Under Construction,” P. Boling, ed., Expecting Trouble: Surrogacy, Fetal Abuse and New Reproductive Technologies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Cynthia R. (1993) At Women's Expense: State Power and the Politics of Fetal Rights. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, Martha A., & Karpin, Isabel, eds. (1995) Mothers in Law: Feminist Theory and the Legal Regulation of Motherhood. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1978) The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Janet (1987). “Prenatal Invasions and Interventions: What's Wrong with Fetal Rights?” 10 Harvard Women's Law J. 958.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvard Law Review (1990) “Note: Rethinking (M)otherhood,” 103 Harvard Law Rev. 13251343.Google Scholar
Johnsen, Dawn (1986) “The Creation of Fetal Rights: Conflicts with Women's Constitutional Rights to Liberty, Privacy, and Equal Protection,” 95 Yale Law J. 599625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnsen, Dawn (1992) “Shared Interests: Promoting Healthy Births without Sacrificing Women's Liberty,” 43 Hastings Law J. 569614.Google ScholarPubMed
Kline, Marlee (1995) “Complicating the Ideology of Motherhood: Child Welfare Law and First Nation Women,” in Fineman, M.A. and Karpin, I., eds., Mothers in Law: Feminist Theory and the Legal Regulation of Motherhood. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Doretta Massardo (1990) “Prosecution of Mothers of Drug-exposed Babies: Constitutional and Criminal Theory,” 139 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 505539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paltrow, Lynn (1999) “Pregnant Drug Users, Fetal Persons, and the Threat to Roe v. Wade,” 62 Albany Law Rev. 9991055.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion (1995) “Punishment, Treatment, Empowerment: Three Approaches to Policy for Pregnant Drug Addicts” in Boling, P., ed., Expecting Trouble: Surrogacy, Fetal Abuse, and New Reproductive Technologies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar